Stock Ticker

Call for consideration of consequences of health disparity incentives in future value-based payment models

Medicare
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

A research letter published in the New England Journal of Medicine calls for careful consideration of the design and consequences of health disparity incentives in future value-based payment models.

The research letter delves into the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed this pay-for-performance program to encourage greater use of home and kidney transplants for Medicare beneficiaries with end-stage kidney disease, while preserving or enhancing quality of care and reducing Medicare expenditures.

Patients receiving home dialysis and kidney transplants are generally considered to have a better quality of life compared to patients receiving conventional in-center dialysis. Individuals of any age with end-stage kidney disease are typically eligible for Medicare coverage for this condition.

The innovative payment model is one of the largest randomized evaluations of pay-for-performance ever conducted in the United States. It randomly assigned dialysis facilities and nephrologists in 30% of hospital referral regions in the country to receive based on how often their patients received home dialysis, received a kidney or were placed on a waitlist.

In 2021, the payment model’s inaugural year, dialysis facilities that disproportionately served patients with social risk factors experienced substantially higher rates of financial penalties. Subsequently, Medicare implemented an incentive to benefit those facilities treating disproportionately many individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid or receiving Medicare’s low-income subsidy to reduce disparities in access to home dialysis and kidney transplants.

The research letter notes that the introduction of this incentive did not narrow disparities in home dialysis, transplant and waitlisting, possibly due to social risk factors which were not considered in the incentive calculation.

However, the added incentive did reduce financial penalties among facilities that disproportionately serve patients who were Black, Hispanic, uninsured or Medicaid-covered, or living in the most socially disadvantaged neighborhoods.

“Major causes of end-stage kidney failure include diabetes, obesity and hypertension, all conditions which significantly impact individuals in disadvantaged communities throughout the course of their lives,” notes research letter co-author Rachel Patzer, Ph.D., MPH, president and chief executive officer of Regenstrief Institute and the Leonard Betley Professor of Surgery at the IU School of Medicine.

“It’s important that payment systems recognize the facilities that disproportionately serve patients in these communities, so that they are not unfairly penalized and can continue to help meet their patients’ needs.”

More information:
Kalli G. Koukounas et al, Performance of Dialysis Facilities after Health-Equity Scoring Incentive, New England Journal of Medicine (2025). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2413208

Citation:
Call for consideration of consequences of health disparity incentives in future value-based payment models (2025, April 30)
retrieved 30 April 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-04-consideration-consequences-health-disparity-incentives.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source link

Get RawNews Daily

Stay informed with our RawNews daily newsletter email

Bethenny Frankel Bleeds After Cutting Her Face With Skin Product on Video

Arsenal v Everton: Line-ups, stats and preview

How a top DC strategist courted Jeffrey Epstein

‘Teen Mom’ and ’16 & Pregnant’ Might Be Subject of New Documentary