Stock Ticker

Rice–fish co-culturing reduces schistosomiasis risk and increases yields and incomes

  • Whitmee, S. et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet 386, 1973–2028 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rohr, J. R. et al. A planetary health innovation for disease, food and water challenges in Africa. Nature 619, 782–787 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myers, S. S. et al. Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18753–18760 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mishra, A. K. et al. Helping feed the world with rice innovations: CGIAR research adoption and socioeconomic impact on farmers. Glob. Food Secur. 33, 100628 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Transforming Food Systems in Africa and Asia: IRRI Annual Report 2022 (IRRI, CGIAR, 2022); https://annual-report-2022.irri.org/

  • World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2017).

  • Mahmood, A., Ghani, H. U. & Gheewala, S. H. Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of rice in Pakistan using a planetary boundary-based approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 39, 123–133 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, S. Enhancing rice production sustainability and resilience via reactivating small water bodies for irrigation and drainage. Nat. Commun. 14, 3794 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, L. et al. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and maintain soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystems. Elife 11, e73869 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xie, J. et al. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice–fish coculture system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111043108 2011.

  • Freed, S. et al. Maintaining diversity of integrated rice and fish production confers adaptability of food systems to global change. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 576179 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • N’Diaye, E. H. M., Bouvier, A.-L. & Waaub, J.-P. Dam construction in the Senegal River Valley and the long-term socioeconomic effects. Knowl. Technol. Policy 19, 44–60 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahmed, N. & Garnett, S. T. Integrated rice–fish farming in Bangladesh: meeting the challenges of food security. Food Secur. 3, 81–92 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dugan, P., Dey, M. M. & Sugunan, V. V. Fisheries and water productivity in tropical river basins: enhancing food security and livelihoods by managing water for fish. Agric. Water Manag. 80, 262–275 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oehme, M., Frei, M., Razzak, M. A., Dewan, S. & Becker, K. Studies on nitrogen cycling under different nitrogen inputs in integrated rice–fish culture in Bangladesh. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 79, 181–191 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wan, N.-F. et al. Ecological intensification of rice production through rice–fish co-culture. J. Clean. Prod. 234, 1002–1012 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Halwart, M., Litsinger, J. A., Barrion, A. T., Viray, M. C. & Kaule, G. Efficacy of Common Carp and Nile Tilapia as biocontrol agents of rice insect pests in the Philippines. Int. J. Pest Manag. 58, 330–346 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lethimonnier, D., Bentz, B., Mikolasek, O. & Oswald, M. Case study of innovations in commercial West African family fish farming that led to an ecological intensification. Aquat. Living Resour. 35, 6 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ofori, J., Abban, E. K., Otoo, E. & Wakatsuki, T. Rice–fish culture: an option for smallholder Sawah rice farmers of the West African lowlands. Ecol. Eng. 24, 233–239 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nnaji, J. C., Madu, C. T. & Raji, A. Profitability of rice–fish farming in Bida, North Central Nigeria. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 8, 148–153 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Colley, D. G., Andros, T. S. & Campbell, C. H. Jr Schistosomiasis is more prevalent than previously thought: what does it mean for public health goals, policies, strategies, guidelines and intervention programs? Infect. Dis. Poverty 6, 63 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, X.-Y. et al. Prevalence and correlations of Schistosomiasis mansoni and Schistosomiasis haematobium among humans and intermediate snail hosts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. Dis. Poverty 13, 63 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • King, C. H. Parasites and poverty: the case of schistosomiasis. Acta Trop. 113, 95–104 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bukenya, G. B., Nsungwa, J. L., Makanga, B. & Salvator, A. Schistosomiasis mansoni and paddy-rice growing in Uganda: an emerging new problem. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 88, 379–384 (1994).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yapi, Y. G. et al. Rice irrigation and schistosomiasis in savannah and forest areas of Côte d’Ivoire. Acta Trop. 93, 201–211 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nyondo, C. S., Mthawanji, R. & Chisale, M. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary schistosomiasis in Kaporo Village, Karonga District, Malawi. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.05.23290821 (2023).

  • Sack, A. et al. Human Schistosoma exposure risk in rice fields and an exploration of fish species for snail and schistosomiasis biocontrol. PLoS Glob. Public Health 5, e0004726 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, I. J., Sokolow, S. H. & De Leo, G. A. Three reasons why expanded use of natural enemy solutions may offer sustainable control of human infections. People Nat. (Hoboken) 4, 32–43 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Su Sin, T. Evaluation of different species of fish for biological control of golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in rice. Crop Prot. 25, 1004–1012 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mutethya, E. & Yongo, E. A comprehensive review of invasion and ecological impacts of introduced common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Lakes Reserv. 26, e12386 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittur, N. et al. Defining persistent hotspots: areas that fail to decrease meaningfully in prevalence after multiple years of mass drug administration with praziquantel for control of schistosomiasis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97, 1810–1817 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • WHO Guideline on Control and Elimination of Human Schistosomiasis 1st edn (World Health Organization, 2022).

  • Lo, N. C. et al. Impact and cost-effectiveness of snail control to achieve disease control targets for schistosomiasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E584–E591 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sokolow, S. H. et al. To reduce the global burden of human schistosomiasis, use ‘old fashioned’ snail control. Trends Parasitol. 34, 23–40 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Konan, C. K. et al. Spatial variation of life-history traits in Bulinus truncatus, the intermediate host of schistosomes, in the context of field application of niclosamide in Côte d’Ivoire. BMC Zool. 7, 7 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Higginbottom, T. P., Adhikari, R. & Foster, T. Rapid expansion of irrigated agriculture in the Senegal River Valley following the 2008 food price crisis. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 014037 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sokolow, S. H. et al. Nearly 400 million people are at higher risk of schistosomiasis because dams block the migration of snail-eating river prawns. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160127 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lund, A. J. et al. Land use impacts on parasitic infection: a cross-sectional epidemiological study on the role of irrigated agriculture in schistosome infection in a dammed landscape. Infect. Dis. Poverty 10, 35 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Angora, E. K. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for schistosomiasis among schoolchildren in two settings of Côte d’Ivoire. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 4, 110 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lund, A. J. et al. Unavoidable risks: local perspectives on water contact behavior and implications for schistosomiasis control in an agricultural region of Northern Senegal. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101, 837–847 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Little, D. C., Bhujel, R. C. & Pham, T. A. Advanced nursing of mixed-sex and mono-sex tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry, and its impact on subsequent growth in fertilized ponds. Aquaculture 221, 265–276 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Civitello, D. J. et al. Transmission potential of human schistosomes can be driven by resource competition among snail intermediate hosts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116512119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bakhoum, S. et al. in Update on Malacology (eds Ray, S & Mukherjee, S.) Ch. 3 (IntechOpen, 2022); https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99217

  • Liang, S., Abe, E. M. & Zhou, X.-N. Integrating ecological approaches to interrupt schistosomiasis transmission: opportunities and challenges. Infect. Dis. Poverty 7, 124 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cui, J. et al. Rice–animal co-culture systems benefit global sustainable intensification. Earths Future 11, e2022EF002984 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohanty, R. K., Thakur, A. K., Ghosh, S., Patil, D. U. Impact of rice–fish–prawn culture on rice-field ecology and productivity. Indian J. Agric. Sci. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v80i7.285 (2010).

  • Li, S.-X. et al. Rice–fish co-culture promotes multiple ecosystem services supporting increased yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 381, 109417 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, F. et al. Biodiversity and sustainability of the integrated rice–fish system in Hani terraces, Yunnan province, China. Aquac. Rep. 20, 100763 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsuruta, T., Yamaguchi, M., Abe, S.-i. & Iguchi, K. Effect of fish in rice–fish culture on the rice yield. Fish. Sci. 77, 95–106 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, P. et al. Evolution of red soil fertility and response of rice yield under long-term fertilization. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24, 2924–2933 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshida, S. Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science (The International Rice Research Institute, 1981); http://books.irri.org/9711040522_content.pdf

  • Sanya, D. R. A. et al. A review of approaches to control bacterial leaf blight in rice. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 113 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Halwart, M. & Gupta, M. V. (eds) Culture of Fish in Rice Fields WorldFish Center Contribution No. 1718 (FAO, The WorldFish Center, 2004).

  • Abao-Paylangco, R. A., Balamad, M. K. M., Paylangco, J. C., Japitana, R. A. & Jumawan, J. C. Schistosoma japonicum in selected rice fields surrounding Lake Mainit, Philippines. J. Ecosyst. Sci. Ecogov. 1, 15–24 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gryseels, B. & de Vlas, S. J. Worm burdens in schistosome infections. Parasitol. Today 12, 115–119 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, I. J. et al. Schistosome infection in Senegal is associated with different spatial extents of risk and ecological drivers for Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009712 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grimes, J. E. T. et al. The relationship between water, sanitation and schistosomiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3296 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ayabina, D. V. et al. Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009083 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Torres-Vitolas, C. A., Trienekens, S. C. M., Zaadnoordijk, W. & Gouvras, A. N. Behaviour change interventions for the control and elimination of schistosomiasis: a systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 17, e0011315 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGillycuddy, M., Popovic, G., Bolker, B. M. & Warton, D. I. Parsimoniously fitting large multivariate random effects in glmmTMB. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v112.i01 (2025).

  • Glasser, F. & Oswald, M. High stocking densities reduce Oreochromis niloticus yield: model building to aid the optimisation of production. Aquat. Living Resour. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(01)01130-5 (2001).

  • Monentcham, S.-E., Kouam, J., Pouomogne, V. & Kestemont, P. Biology and prospect for aquaculture of African bonytongue, Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier, 1829): a review. Aquaculture 289, 191–198 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaye, P. M., Doucouré, S., Sow, D., Sokhna, C. & Ranque, S. Identification of Bulinus forskalii as a potential intermediate host of Schistosoma hæmatobium in Senegal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 17, e0010584 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Senghor, B. et al. Study of the snail intermediate hosts of urogenital schistosomiasis in Niakhar, region of Fatick, West central Senegal. Parasit. Vectors 8, 410 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pennance, T. et al. Interactions between Schistosoma haematobium group species and their Bulinus spp. intermediate hosts along the Niger River Valley. Parasit. Vectors 13, 268 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Joof, E., Sanneh, B., Sambou, S. M. & Wade, C. M. Species diversity and distribution of schistosome intermediate snail hosts in The Gambia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009823 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adeyemo, P. et al. Estimating the financial impact of livestock schistosomiasis on traditional subsistence and transhumance farmers keeping cattle, sheep and goats in northern Senegal. Parasites Vectors 15, 101 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haggerty, C. J. E. et al. Aquatic macrophytes and macroinvertebrate predators affect densities of snail hosts and local production of schistosome cercariae that cause human schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl.Trop. Dis. 14, e0008417 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mahl, U. H., Tank, J. L., Roley, S. S. & Davis, R. T. Two-stage ditch floodplains enhance N-removal capacity and reduce turbidity and dissolved P in agricultural streams. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 51, 923–940 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hartig, F. DHARMa – residual diagnostics for hierarchical models. GitHub https://github.com/florianhartig/dharma (2024).

  • Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. GitHub https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/ (2025).

  • Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016); https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org

  • Pedersen, T. L. patchwork: The composer of plots. CRAN https://patchwork.data-imaginist.com (2025).

  • Lüdecke, D. ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 772 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Agence National de la Statistique et de la Démographie (ANSD). Enquête Harmonisée sur le Conditions de Vie des Ménages 2018–2019 SEN_2018_EHCVM_v02_M (World Bank, Development Data Group, 2022); https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/study/SEN_2018_EHCVM_v02_M

  • 1 XOF to USD – convert CFA francs to US dollars. XE Corporation https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=XOF&To=USD (2025).

  • Selland, E. et al. Rice–fish co-culturing for schistosomiasis control and agricultural gains in Senegal. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29522000 (2026).

  • Source link

    Get RawNews Daily

    Stay informed with our RawNews daily newsletter email

    Rice–fish co-culturing reduces schistosomiasis risk and increases yields and incomes

    Saudi Aramco CEO warns oil markets may not normalize until 2027

    Sen. John Curtis exploring 2028 run for Utah governor

    ‘RHONJ’ Jennifer Fessler Regrets Defending West Wilson After Shutting Down Rumor