Stock Ticker

Anthropocene deserves official recognition, some experts maintain

Anthropocene deserves official recognition, some experts maintain
The sharp change across the base of the proposed Anthropocene series (1952 CE) in varved sediments from Crawford Lake is recorded by numerous proxies of the Great Acceleration reflecting nuclear weapons testing (239+240Pu, 137Cs and F14C), the consequence of burning fossil fuels (spheroidal carbonaceous particles or SCPs/fly ash, δ15N), and consequent changes to lake ecology (relative increase in the deep-dwelling chrysophyte Synura; decline in the diatom Lindavia michiganiana). Credit: AGU Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1029/2024AV001430

Humans have remodeled the Earth so profoundly that in 2000, atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen and biologist Eugene Stoermer proposed that the Holocene epoch had ended and the “Anthropocene,” or human epoch, had begun.

But despite the extent of human-induced changes, last year the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) decided against giving the Anthropocene official recognition as the current geologic epoch. Now, several scientists involved in the process have published a commentary in AGU Advances explaining why they think the Anthropocene deserves another chance at epoch status.

Francine McCarthy and colleagues argue against two related criticisms of the proposal: First, the proposed Anthropocene began only 72 years ago, whereas epochs typically span millions of years, and second, the future is not a part of geologic time, so it would be inappropriate to designate an epoch based on the expectation that humans will be making their mark on Earth far into the future.

The length of the Anthropocene is beside the point, the authors argue, because functionally, Earth has already entered an unprecedented time. Energy consumption since the mid-20th century is sixfold what it was in the 11,700 years that came before. As a result, are rising sharply, with wide-ranging implications for everything from ocean levels to biodiversity to ice sheets.

These changes will be long-lived, and some are irreversible. In fact, the onset and magnitude of such dramatic alterations over such a short timescale underscore the point that Earth has entered a new epoch, the authors say.

Some stratigraphers have argued that designating a human-centric epoch politicizes geology, but the authors argue that ignoring data to preserve the status quo is just as political. Likewise, the authors take umbrage with reports that the matter cannot be revisited for a decade and thus the question of whether we live in the Anthropocene is settled until then. “It is not,” they wrote.

More information:
Francine M. G. McCarthy et al, Would Adding the Anthropocene to the Geologic Time Scale Matter?, AGU Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1029/2024AV001430

This story is republished courtesy of Eos, hosted by the American Geophysical Union. Read the original story here.

Citation:
Anthropocene deserves official recognition, some experts maintain (2025, March 25)
retrieved 25 March 2025
from https://phys.org/news/2025-03-anthropocene-recognition-experts.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source link

Get RawNews Daily

Stay informed with our RawNews daily newsletter email

Anthropocene deserves official recognition, some experts maintain

The First Giant Land Organism May Require A New Branch On The Tree Of Life

Olympic Track Star Gabby Thomas Engaged After Romantic Rooftop Proposal

“Want To Dedicate It…”: Ashutosh Sharma Takes Surprise Name After Miracle Chase In DC vs LSG IPL 2025 Game