Phelan, A. L. & Sirleaf, M. Decolonization of global health law: lessons from international environmental law. J. Law Med. Ethics 51, 450–453 (2023).
Bagley, M. A. ‘Just’ sharing: the virtues of digital sequence information benefit-sharing for the common good. Harv. Int. Law J. 63, 1 (2022).
Ljungqvist, G. V. et al. Global patterns in access and benefit-sharing: a comprehensive review of national policies. BMJ Public Health 3, e001800 (2025).
Deplazes-Zemp, A. et al. The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 917–919 (2018).
Sett, S. et al. Harmonize rules for digital sequence information benefit-sharing across UN frameworks. Nat. Commun. 15, 8745 (2024).
Laird, S. et al. Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing. Science 367, 1200–1202 (2020).
Eccleston-Turner, M. & Rourke, M. Arguments against the inequitable distribution of vaccines using the access and benefit sharing transaction. Int. Comp. Law Q. 70, 825–858 (2021).
Halewood, M., Bagley, M. A., Wyss, M. & Scholz, A. H. New benefit-sharing principles for digital sequence information. Science 382, 520–522 (2023).
United Nations Economic and Social Council. General comment no. 25 (2020) on science and economic, social and cultural rights (article 15 (1) (b), (2), (3) and (4) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). UN Doc E/C.12/GC/25 www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2020-article-15-science-and (2020).
Stoudt, S. et al. Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1012232 (2024).
Desjardins-Proulx, P. et al. The case for open preprints in biology. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001563 (2013).
Fortunato, L. & Galassi, M. The case for free and open source software in research and scholarship. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 379, 20200079 (2021).
Carlson, C. et al. Save lives in the next pandemic: ensure vaccine equity now. Nature 626, 952–953 (2024).
Ambler, J. et al. Including digital sequence data in the Nagoya Protocol can promote data sharing. Trends Biotechnol. 39, 116–125 (2021).
Data Citation Synthesis Group. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles force11.org/info/joint-declaration-of-data-citation-principles-final/ (2014).
Gewin, V. Pack up the parachute: why global north–south collaborations need to change. Nature 619, 885–887 (2023).
Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E. & Ratner, H. ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers. Learn. Publ. 25, 259–264 (2012).
Cress, P. E. Why do academic authors need an ORCID ID? Aesthet. Surg. J. 39, 696–697 (2019).
Bohannon, J. & Doran, K. Introducing ORCID. Science 356, 691–692 (2017).
Haak, L. L., Meadows, A. & Brown, J. Using ORCID, DOI, and other open identifiers in research evaluation. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 3, 385633 (2018).
Barker, M. et al. Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software. Sci. Data 9, 622 (2022).
GBIF Secretariat. GBIF Science Review No. 11 https://doi.org/10.35035/d9pk-1162 (2024).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Dunning, A., De Smaele, M. & Böhmer, J. Are the FAIR Data Principles fair? Int. J. Digit. Curation 12, 177–195 (2024).
Landi, A. et al. The ‘A’ of FAIR — as open as possible, as closed as necessary. Data Intell. 2, 47–55 (2020).
Carroll, S. R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M., Russell, K. & Stall, S. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures. Sci. Data 8, 108 (2021).
Lin, D. et al. The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Sci. Data 7, 144 (2020).
