Stock Ticker

Under £1, Lloyds shares are the cheapest of UK banks. But are they the right choice for passive income?

Under £1, Lloyds shares are the cheapest of UK banks. But are they the right choice for passive income?

Image source: Getty Images

Lloyds’ (LSE :LLOY) shares are trading at 95.8p, making them the only major UK bank stock selling for less than a quid. But does the low price represent good value and, more importantly, are they the best option for passive income?

At first glance, Lloyds looks appealing. A dividend yield of 3.71% beats most savings accounts, and a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.22 suggests it isn’t overpriced.

For a UK-focused bank with a simple business model, that can feel reassuring. But income investors rarely look at one stock in isolation.

How much income could Lloyds actually deliver?

If you invested £10,000, a 3.71% yield would generate around £371 a year in dividends, assuming payouts remain stable. That’s a decent baseline, especially for a bank often seen as a barometer of the UK economy.

But it’s a bit lacklustre compared to the type of returns most passive income investors target. On the plus side, it’s sufficiently covered by earnings, growing 9% year-on-year (yoy), and backed by the reliability of a well-established bank

To sum it up, Lloyds offers consistency, but not standout income or growth.

Is there better value among FTSE 100 banks?

Looking across the sector, a few rivals offer more compelling numbers.

Bank Yield P/E Ratio Earnings growth (yoy) Notable Point
Lloyds 3.71% 12.22 9% UK-focused, low share price.
NatWest 5.59% 8.16 19.76% Highest yield, strongest value.
Barclays 2% 9.27 15.64% 42-year dividend record.
HSBC 4.23% 14.78 6.33% Price up 203% in five years.

NatWest clearly stands out for income and value. A 5.59% yield is significantly higher than Lloyds, and its lower P/E ratio suggests the shares may be undervalued. Add earnings growth of 19.76%, and it looks attractive.

However, the share price is down 13% this year, and its eight-year dividend track record is relatively short.

Barclays sits at the opposite end. The yield is just 2%, but it has paid dividends for 42 consecutive years. For cautious investors, reliability matters.

HSBC offers a middle ground. Its 4.23% yield is solid, and its global footprint provides diversification. The share price has climbed 203% over five years, which highlights its growth credentials.

What should income investors focus on?

When choosing between these banks, it helps to weigh a few key factors:

  • Dividend yield: higher yields boost income but can signal risk.
  • Valuation: lower P/E ratios may indicate better value.
  • Reliability: long dividend histories reduce uncertainty.
  • Growth: rising earnings support future payouts.

For income and value investors, NatWest looks a clear winner. But with a weakening price and only an eight-year payment record, it lacks the long-term reliability of Barclays. And HSBC’s global diversification and strong share price performance make it appealing for a mix of income and growth.

So long story short. For high-yield dividend hunters, NatWest deserves a closer look. From a defensive point of view, both Barclays and HSBC could help quell volatility over the long term.

Lloyds meanwhile, remains a dependable option. It’s often viewed as a bellwether for the UK market, making it a good foundational stock to consider in any portfolio.

Source link

Get RawNews Daily

Stay informed with our RawNews daily newsletter email

Under £1, Lloyds shares are the cheapest of UK banks. But are they the right choice for passive income?

Kyle Richards What’s The Big Frigin’ Difference?!

3 takeaways from Martin Lewis’s recent show on investing

Le’Veon Bell Says Jake Paul Is ‘More Of A Match’ For Him Than Logan Paul