![[original_title]](https://rawnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Counting-Absentee-Ballots.jpg)
Massive win for election integrity in PA as court docket confirms improper absentee ballots received’t be counted
Frequent sense has prevailed in Pennsylvania – a minimum of for now – as the US Circuit Courtroom of Appeals for the Third Circuit has dominated in favor of retaining a Pennsylvania rule intact that states absentee ballots that aren’t correctly dated won’t be counted.
You may assume {that a} poll that has not been signed or dated merely wouldn’t be counted, however Democrats, of their never-ending quest to control the mail-in poll system to allow them to stack the vote in favor of their candidates – really had a lawyer, Mark Elias, challenge these regulations. He even went as far as to say that it was probably the most vital circumstances this 12 months.
The case was pushed by voter advocacy teams such because the League of Ladies Voters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Convention of NAACP branches, who have been difficult state legal guidelines that dismiss absentee ballots that aren’t dated appropriately. A number of county boards of elections and the Secretary of the Commonwealth argued that requiring the ballots to be dated is a crucial measure with a purpose to uphold the sanctity of the voting course of.
Fortunately, the Third Circuit Courtroom of Appeals wouldn’t allow them to get away with this nonsense, denying to even hear a case about whether or not the date requirement for absentee ballots is enforceable in a 9-to-4 vote.
One can solely hope that the vote will set a precedent for a lot stricter guidelines relating to the mail-in voting course of. The choice is being hailed as an enormous win for election integrity.
Absentee ballots with incorrect info or with out dates typically pose points in elections and result in disqualifications. Though the precise guidelines range by state and locality, there are sometimes necessities associated to the voter signature and date on an inside envelope or the postmark date on the skin of the poll.
Human data is beneath assault! Governments and highly effective companies are utilizing censorship to wipe out humanity’s data base about vitamin, herbs, self-reliance, pure immunity, meals manufacturing, preparedness and far more. We’re preserving human data utilizing AI expertise whereas constructing the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Discover our free, downloadable generative AI instruments at Brighteon.AI. Assist our efforts to construct the infrastructure of human freedom by purchasing at HealthRangerStore.com, that includes lab-tested, licensed natural, non-GMO meals and dietary options.
Arizona courts uphold voting legal guidelines associated to proof of citizenship
The ruling brings Pennsylvania consistent with different states which were cracking down on absentee poll abuse after the 2020 presidential election fiasco. For instance, Arizona courts have just lately upheld voting legal guidelines associated to presenting proof of citizenship. In March, a U.S. District Decide dominated that Arizona’s new voting legal guidelines requiring voters to current proof of citizenship will not be discriminatory. The ruling was associated to a provision requiring counties to confirm the standing of all registered voters who haven’t provided proof of their American citizenship and to cross-check their registration info towards authorities databases.
In her ruling, U.S. District Decide Susan Bolton wrote: “Contemplating the proof as a complete, the court docket concludes that Arizona’s pursuits in stopping non-citizens from voting and selling public confidence in Arizona’s elections outweighs the restricted burden voters may encounter when required to offer (documentary proof of citizenship).”
Alabama, Mississippi and Texas have all handed legal guidelines focusing on the practice of harvesting absentee ballots because the 2020 election, proscribing components such because the variety of ballots {that a} single individual can witness, who’s allowed to witness people signing their absentee ballots, and who’s permitted to return these ballots on behalf of voters.
A number of different states have additionally made tweaks to make their election processes fairer and extra reliable, however there’s nonetheless extra work to do to shut the door to abuse.
Sources for this text embody:
