Focus on all basic (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and points, investing information, and concept.
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 1:24 am
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by Carol88888 »
Lawyered_ wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 4:08 pmCarol88888 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 2:21 pm
I hate it . Particularly the hedged fund futures. Hedge funds don’t outperform the S&P after bills. Buffett proved that together with his wager to my satisfaction. I do not know a lot about managed futures however I feel you might need expense points there as effectively together with how these items get taxed.If there’s one factor I’ve realized from these boards it is that less complicated is best. Do not over suppose it.
It’s not Hedged Fund futures. It’s pattern following through managed futures. Here’s a simulation of RSST since 1992 utilizing KMLM as a proxy. RSST is 100% SPY and 100% Managed Futures.
The truth that HFND has an expense ratio of 1.22% and CTA has an expense ratio of .78% is sufficient to make me run for the hills.
Re: The New 60/40: 40% of what?
I perceive the treasuries however the remaining is a dumpster hearth. managed futures, hedge fund tracker- wtf,o? The one purpose to have gold, effectively
I am unable to, except you might be trend-following current gold.
Who’s promoting you this diversification plan?
westpac
Nonetheless on Patrol.
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:20 pm
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by FoundingFather »
betablocker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:28 pm
As a result of the bond bull marketplace for the final 40 years has ended.
It appears to me that we disagree on this fundamental premise. Why do you suppose bonds are a nasty deal proper now? As others have identified, bonds are much more enticing now than they had been a couple of years in the past, in case you are into that market timing factor…
I purchased a few of the 30 12 months TIPS lately at 2.3% actual yield. Until I actually misunderstand bonds, why ought to 2.3% actual yield make me nervous?
Founding Father
“I don’t suppose myself equal to the Command I’m honored with.” -George Washington (excerpt from Journals of the Continental Congress, 16 June 1775)
Re: The New 60/40
FoundingFather wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:48 pmbetablocker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:28 pm
As a result of the bond bull marketplace for the final 40 years has ended.It appears to me that we disagree on this fundamental premise. Why do you suppose bonds are a nasty deal proper now? As others have identified, bonds are much more enticing now than they had been a couple of years in the past, in case you are into that market timing factor…
I purchased a few of the 30 12 months TIPS lately at 2.3% actual yield. Until I actually misunderstand bonds, why ought to 2.3% actual yield make me nervous?
Founding Father
I feel the issue individuals right here have with bonds is considered one of recency bias and expectation. Bonds used to carry out a lot better over the previous few many years so people have concluded that is how they should carry out endlessly. Nevertheless, the monetary markets do not owe us a selected return on any given asset class. I am certain sooner or later sooner or later there shall be an prolonged interval the place shares are returning considerably lower than what they do right this moment and people shall be adamant that shares are a nasty funding.
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:50 pm
- Location: Nashville TN
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by topper1296 »
globalpatriot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 6:50 pm
I just like the de-risk and legal responsibility match remark above for bond causes.That being stated I do have 10% in “options” at the moment 3% IAU (gold) and seven% VNQ (actual property) however I do not know if that helps a lot .
My various asset allocation is similar to this. I’ve 5% every in gold and REITS for my various property. I checked out others however REITS and gold have cheap bills ratios in comparison with most different viable various property.
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 53626
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened on the poles, is my abode.–O. Henry
Re: The New 60/40
What, precisely, is a “regime?” Do we all know for certain that “regimes” are an actual factor in bonds, and never one thing we understand within the file, after the very fact? The NEBR won’t decide to saying we’re in a recession till it’s over; are bond “regimes” totally different?
Which is our technique to be?
a) Keep the course.
b) Decide what sort of regime we’re in, decide the place we’re in it, decide when the regime is about to finish or has ended, decide what the brand new regime is, and alter course each time the regime adjustments?
Annual revenue twenty kilos, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and 6, consequence happiness; Annual revenue twenty kilos, annual expenditure twenty kilos ought and 6, consequence distress.
Re: The New 60/40
betablocker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 5:46 pm
I’d additionally love to incorporate inflation linked securities however there aren’t any good non-advisor automobiles for that.
??? If you need Lengthy-Time period TIPS there’s the Pimco 15+ 12 months US TIPS ETF (LTPZ). For Intermediate-Time period TIPS, Constancy and Vanguard have glorious and low-cost expense ratio mutual funds and Schwab has a wonderful US TIPS ETF as effectively. iShares and Vanguard have glorious Quick-Time period TIPS ETFs. You do not want an Advisor to entry these. You may also purchase TIPS individually at a really low value additionally with out an Advisor. Until you reside exterior of the US, you’ve got loads of good TIPS merchandise accessible.
A idiot and his cash are good for enterprise.
Re: The New 60/40
if you need extra return than a 60/40 (and bonds have achieved nice currently), then why not go to 65/35 or 70/30 for long run. 1-2 unhealthy years for one thing is okay – hopefully somebody purchased at bond lows
-
Subject Creator
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:26 pm
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by betablocker »
FoundingFather wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:48 pmbetablocker wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:28 pm
As a result of the bond bull marketplace for the final 40 years has ended.It appears to me that we disagree on this fundamental premise. Why do you suppose bonds are a nasty deal proper now? As others have identified, bonds are much more enticing now than they had been a couple of years in the past, in case you are into that market timing factor…
I purchased a few of the 30 12 months TIPS lately at 2.3% actual yield. Until I actually misunderstand bonds, why ought to 2.3% actual yield make me nervous?
Founding Father
If inflation goes again up, Treasuries go down. In addition they are inclined to correlate with equities. I wouldn’t say that folks shouldn’t personal treasuries simply that they aren’t an ideal hedge and there are others traders ought to take a look at together with of their portfolios. TIPS make some sense to me however they’re an odd instrument and CPI isn’t essentially the most dependable inflation gage. However that’s simply my opinion.
-
Subject Creator
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:26 pm
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by betablocker »
nedsaid wrote: ↑Solar Sep 15, 2024 11:59 ambetablocker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 5:46 pm
I’d additionally love to incorporate inflation linked securities however there aren’t any good non-advisor automobiles for that.??? If you need Lengthy-Time period TIPS there’s the Pimco 15+ 12 months US TIPS ETF (LTPZ). For Intermediate-Time period TIPS, Constancy and Vanguard have glorious and low-cost expense ratio mutual funds and Schwab has a wonderful US TIPS ETF as effectively. iShares and Vanguard have glorious Quick-Time period TIPS ETFs. You do not want an Advisor to entry these. You may also purchase TIPS individually at a really low value additionally with out an Advisor. Until you reside exterior of the US, you’ve got loads of good TIPS merchandise accessible.
Sorry meant insurance coverage linked securities.
-
Subject Creator
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:26 pm
Re: The New 60/40
Post
by betablocker »
What in regards to the different 20% of the time? That’s my level. You possibly can go a decade plus with unfavourable actual fairness and/or treasury returns as we did within the Seventies. I feel it’s simply ahistorical to disregard these points and never embrace different diversification.