NRA Posts Misrepresent Harris' Place on Gun Possession - FactCheck.org

0 Likes

September 24, 2024

Este artículo estará disponible en español en El Tiempo Latino.

Fast Take

Vice President Kamala Harris helps a ban on the sale of so-called assault weapons, however now not helps a compulsory buyback program for such weapons. The Nationwide Rifle Affiliation misleadingly claims that Harris will “ban law-abiding Individuals from proudly owning” weapons and “seize your legally owned weapons.” Her proposal wouldn’t ban all weapons or seize any weapons.

Full Story

Through the 2020 presidential race, then-Sen. Kamala Harris got here out in support of a compulsory buyback program for so-called assault weapons. At a gun security discussion board in Las Vegas, Harris mentioned, “we’ve to have a buyback program, and I help a compulsory buyback program.”

Harris additionally said that such weapons “shouldn’t be on the streets of a civil society” in a November 2019 NBC Information interview.

As the present Democratic nominee for president, Harris continues to support a ban on buying sure semiautomatic weapons. However her marketing campaign advised us she is no longer advocating that Individuals be required to surrender weapons that they’d legally bought.

Harris was questioned about her coverage modifications on weapons and different points in the course of the Sept. 10 debate with former President Donald Trump. She said that her “values haven’t modified,” however didn’t remark extra particularly on her place. Later within the debate, Harris said, “We’re not taking anyone’s weapons away.”

However a Sept. 17 Instagram post by the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation falsely claims, “All Kamala Harris is aware of about weapons is that she desires to ban them.” Within the video, Harris could be heard calling for common background checks and shutting the so-called gun-show loophole that enables unlicensed people to promote firearms with out performing background checks.

The put up claims that Harris desires to “ban law-abiding Individuals from proudly owning [guns].” Another Instagram post by the NRA on Sept. 18 claims, “Kamala Harris will seize your legally owned weapons.”

However the claims misrepresent the vice chairman’s place on firearms. Whereas Harris helps a ban on so-called assault weapons, her plan wouldn’t apply to such weapons bought earlier than the proposed ban would take impact. The U.S. had the same ban in place for 10 years, from 1994 to 2004, on the sale of sure semiautomatic weapons, as we have written earlier than.

When requested for remark concerning the declare that Harris desires to “ban law-abiding Individuals from proudly owning” weapons, an NRA spokesperson directed us to a recent post on X by Harris’ official vice presidential account that reads, “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban.”

At a Sept. 19 campaign event with former speak present host Oprah Winfrey, Harris advised households of college taking pictures victims that “for a lot too lengthy on the difficulty of gun violence, some folks have been pushing a extremely false option to counsel you’re both in favor of the Second Modification otherwise you wish to take everybody’s weapons away. I’m in favor of the Second Modification, and I’m in favor of assault weapons bans, common background checks, pink flag legal guidelines, and these are simply widespread sense.”

The coverage part of Harris’ campaign website additionally displays this place, stating that, “She’ll ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, require common background checks, and help pink flag legal guidelines that maintain weapons out of the arms of harmful folks.”

On the marketing campaign path in 2019, Harris mentioned that she owned a gun for “private security.” Through the presidential debate, she mentioned, “Tim Walz and I are each gun homeowners.” And he or she advised Winfrey, “If anyone breaks in my home, they’re getting shot.”

Editor’s be aware: FactCheck.org is one among a number of organizations working with Facebook to debunk misinformation shared on social media. Our earlier tales could be discovered here. Fb has no control over our editorial content material.