U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz was the lone “nay” vote in opposition to the 2017 Combating Human Trafficking in Industrial Autos Act.
Gaetz was the lone “no” vote on the invoice. Seven Republicans and 5 Democrats within the Home didn’t forged any vote for the invoice. It handed by unanimous consent within the Senate.
In November 2024, U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida withdrew his identify from consideration as President-elect Donald Trump’s legal professional normal, as federal investigators said they found funds he made to quite a few ladies in change for intercourse.
Gaetz additionally was beneath investigation in 2021 to find out whether or not he violated federal sex-trafficking legal guidelines that make it unlawful to induce somebody youthful than 18 to journey throughout state strains to have interaction in intercourse in change for cash or one thing of worth. Gaetz allegedly paid for a 17-year-old woman to journey with him about two years earlier.
The controversy resulted in lots of on-line scrutinizing Gaetz’s voting report. For instance, viral TikTok and Reddit posts from November 2024 shared the possibly ironic proven fact that Gaetz was the only real “no” vote on an anti-sex-trafficking invoice in 2017.
(Reddit)
One other meme shared on X in 2021 highlighted the identical vote:
The claims that Gaetz was the one vote in opposition to such a invoice have been correct.
In 2017, Gaetz was the sole “nay” vote on an anti-human-trafficking invoice. (Twelve representatives — 5 Democrats and 7 Republicans — didn’t vote.) The Combating Human Trafficking in Industrial Autos Act designated a trafficking prevention coordinator on the Division of Transportation and created a committee for states and transportation teams to develop finest practices on combating human trafficking.
Gaetz’s vote could be seen on Govtrack.
He defended his vote in a Fb reside video in December 2017, saying, “Until there may be an amazing, compelling purpose that our present businesses within the federal authorities cannot deal with that drawback, I vote no as a result of voters in Northwest Florida didn’t ship me to Washington to go and create extra federal authorities. If something, we ought to be abolishing a whole lot of the businesses on the federal degree just like the Division of Schooling, just like the EPA and sending that energy again to our state governments.”
The invoice in the end passed and was signed into regulation by tTrump in January 2018.
On condition that Gaetz’s “no” vote was well-documented by varied sources, we charge this declare as true.
Sources
Grayer, Eric Bradner, Kristen Holmes, Alayna Treene, Sarah Ferris, Annie. “Gaetz Withdraws from Legal professional Common Consideration | CNN Politics.” CNN, 21 Nov. 2024, https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/21/politics/matt-gaetz-withdrawing-attorney-general/index.html.
Little, Jim. “Matt Gaetz Defends Lone No Vote on Anti-Human Trafficking Invoice.” Pensacola Information Journal, https://www.pnj.com/story/information/politics/2017/12/29/matt-gaetz-defends-lone-no-vote-anti-human-trafficking-bill/990407001/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
“S. 1536: Combating Human Trafficking in Industrial Autos Act — Home Vote #695 — Dec 19, 2017.” GovTrack.Us, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2017/h695. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
Snodgrass, Erin. “Matt Gaetz Is beneath Investigation on Suspicion of Violating Federal Intercourse-Trafficking Legal guidelines. In 2017, He Solid the Solely Vote in opposition to a Human Trafficking Invoice.” Enterprise Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/matt-gaetz-once-cast-the-only-vote-against-anti-human-trafficking-bill. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
