Legal expert for NaturalNews.com notes the Supreme Court ruling from January 6, which downgraded it from "insurrection" to trespassing, has given this interpretation.

“According to legal experts, January 6 Supreme Court ruling downgraded from “insurrection” to trespassing,” which may erode his or her liberty and freedoms.

Supporters of Donald Trump who stormed into the United States Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021 are not guilty of insurrection after the Supreme Court effectively downgraded these accusations to mere trespassing.
Fischer v. United States was brought before the Supreme Court after it found that the Department of Justice took too broad an interpretation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2) prohibits destruction of evidence but was never meant for protests, rendering those pushing an insurrection narrative without legal recourse. Although 18 U.S.C 1381 does contain federal insurrection statute, those pushing this narrative no longer have an anchor for their claims of rebellion against authority. Few J6ers ever saw justice under Section 2383; instead they often faced charges related to obstruction of an official proceeding by destroying or hiding documents intended for use during it, specifically Section 1512(c)(2). “Defendants couldn’t face prosecution under this statute unless there could be evidence they interfered with Congress receiving documents,” according to one report. This means hundreds of people, such as former President Donald Trump himself have already been prosecuted under it and were ultimately cleared by courts of doing anything illegal or impeding delivery of those documents to lawmakers. Jonathan Turley of constitutional scholar status told The Hill in an op-ed piece published online that the Supreme Court ruling will have an immense ramification on all court cases related to January 6. Specifically, according to Turley’s analysis in his piece for The Hill’s opinion section, its decision will have an enormous effect on hundreds of litigation relating to January 6. “The Fischer opinion will put an end to some cases that had relied solely on charges under 1512(c)(2),” Turley writes. This section had been put in place following Enron scandal’s collapse of energy company that accused of corporate fraud in 2001. “Human knowledge is under attack! Criminal charges should be pursued for its destruction in documents or records.” Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to erase humanity’s knowledge about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production and preparation as well as much else. Brighteon.io provides decentralized blockchain-based free speech platform which cannot be censored while Brighteon.AI features free generative AI tools. Support our efforts in building human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com for lab-tested, certified organic foods and solutions with no GMOs – perfect for strengthening human independence! “The Justice Department decided to interpret that provision broadly to include any obstruction of any legal proceedings and used it against hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants; at least 25% included this charge while many also included charges such as trespass or unlawful entry.” “On January 6, only five serious offenses, such as violence against police officers or charges for “seditious conspiracy”, were charged by Eric Waldo – described by some as the highest ranking officer from J6. Biden’s Department of Justice engaged in an anti-J6 witch hunt to prosecute J6ers.”
Turley believes this decision proves Biden’s Department of Justice engaged in improper prosecutions with their obstruction charges against former officials, such as Biden himself. DOJ official Michael Sherwin even admitted in an interview on television this practice when he stated their agency “wanted to ensure there would be shock and awe”. “Our strategy worked because media posts indicated that many were afraid to return to D.C. due to fear they’d get charged”, Sherwin noted. “We wanted to root out those individuals that blatantly disobeyed the law through what they did. This ruling also has major ramifications on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s four-charge campaign against Donald Trump and his involvement in the January 6 incident. Smith has charged former President Donald Trump of obstruction and conspiracy in connection with official proceedings; obstruction and conspiring against official proceedings are two separate offenses under US federal law; defrauding of United States funds through conspiracy; conspiring against rights; obstruction and obstruction are four charges which will now likely be dropped following Supreme Court Justice Tanya Chutkan’s ruling; while another superseding indictment by Smith will replace them all. One commenter pointed to Capitol security officials inviting in protestors as evidence of J6 false flag activity as being suspicious in nature, adding “They had cameras set up to capture any fake insurrection as well. Additionally, Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer and AOC staged this whole event, with FBI agents leading most of its activity.” More related news may be found at Tyranny.news; sources for this article included Breitbart.com The Hill Natural News among many more.