DJ and producer Diplo has been sued for distributing revenge porn, marking the second accusation lobbed in opposition to him for a similar offense in lower than a yr.
Within the go well with, filed in California on Thursday, an unidentified girl known as Jane Doe stated she had an intimate relationship with Diplo from June 2016 to October 2023. She began chatting with Diplo, whose actual identify is Thomas Wesley Pentz, on Snapchat in April 2016 when she was 21 years outdated. That June, he invited Doe to his Manhattan resort room and commenced an intimate relationship that continued for years. Final November, the grievance says that she found Diplo had been allegedly distributing photographs and movies of their sexual interactions with out her consent.
Doe states that in their relationship, she made it clear to Diplo that she didn’t need him filming or distributing movies or photographs made with out consent. In November, she asserts that one other girl reached out explaining that she had express movies that includes Doe in them that Diplo had given to her over Snapchat in Oct. 2018. On Nov. 7, Doe reported Diplo to the New York Police Division and a warrant was issued for his arrest.
Requests for remark from Diplo’s representatives and lawyer went unanswered.
This isn’t the primary time that Diplo has been accused of disseminating revenge porn. In 2020, a girl named Shelly Auguste claimed that Diplo had sexually assaulted her and distributed revenge porn with out her consent. Diplo responded together with his personal go well with and claimed on Instagram that she was a “stalker” who engaged in a baseless smear marketing campaign.
In August 2023, Auguste filed one other report with the Los Angeles Police Division alleging that he distributed nude images of her. In November, the LAPD submitted the case to the Los Angeles lawyer’s workplace, and it was taken underneath assessment.
“Tragically, this isn’t the primary time the defendant has shamed and violated a girl by disseminating intimate photographs with out her consent,” stated Doe’s lawyer Helene Weiss, associate at Marsh Legislation Agency, in a press release shared with Selection. “Diplo’s alleged illicit sample of habits illustrates the hurt he’s brought about Jane Doe, and different younger ladies identical to her. Our consumer deserves justice, and she or he’s hopeful that this litigation could function a catalyst in ending the defendant’s repeated victimization of girls as soon as and for all.”
“Revenge pornography is an abhorrent violation of privateness and belief, inflicting profound emotional trauma on victims like Jane Doe,” provides Micha Liberty of Liberty Legislation. “Diplo’s actions symbolize a extreme abuse of energy and a blatant disregard for human dignity. It’s crucial that we, as a society, condemn such actions and maintain perpetrators accountable. This lawsuit is a crucial step in the direction of justice, highlighting the need of defending the rights of those that have been exploited. Jane Doe’s bravery in talking out in opposition to this injustice is a strong reminder of the necessity for systemic change to help and safeguard all survivors of such violations.”
“Rampant repeated sexual abuse by the wealthy and well-known is deeply embedded into the leisure trade, however we’re witnessing a cultural shift the place survivors and their tales refuse to stay silent within the identify of excursions and ticket gross sales,” says Margaret E. Mabie, associate at Marsh Legislation Agency. “Our courageous consumer’s story is one in all Diplo’s many worst-kept secrets and techniques, and the submitting this case is her first step at forging a path to civil justice.”
