In current weeks, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Sen. Tim Scott supplied seemingly contradictory claims when discussing the affect of inflation on the everyday American’s wages and earnings.
Throughout prepared testimony to the Home Methods and Means Committee on April 30, Yellen claimed that “actual wages and family median wealth have elevated since earlier than the pandemic.” Equally, in a June 13 interview with CNBC, she stated that “all People, each those that are effectively off and people who are close to the underside of the earnings distribution, are higher off now. Their wages have risen greater than costs.”
Conversely, during a June 16 interview on ABC Information’ “This Week,” Scott claimed that for the “working class coalition … beneath Joe Biden … their wages, frankly, have gone down. Prices have gone up. And so they have much less spending energy.”
Each Scott and Yellen can cite financial knowledge that assist their claims. The distinction between the 2 claims is that Scott analyzed adjustments in inflation-adjusted wages and incomes since President Joe Biden entered workplace in 2021, whereas Yellen started her evaluation in 2019, arguing that the pandemic distorted evaluations that started when Biden entered workplace.
Measuring from the beginning of Biden’s time period in workplace, each wages and incomes haven’t saved up with inflation. Nevertheless, measuring from earlier than the pandemic to the current, inflation-adjusted wages and incomes have barely elevated.
To investigate these claims, we requested a number of economists to guage whether or not it was extra helpful to measure adjustments in actual wages and incomes beneath Biden by starting in 2019 or 2021. The query elicited disagreement from the economists we interviewed.
Scott’s Timeline: 2021 to the Current
Since Biden entered workplace, three key macroeconomic metrics gauging the buying energy of People by way of their wages and disposable earnings have every elevated at a slower tempo than inflation, supporting Scott’s declare.
First, our evaluation of Bureau of Labor Statistics knowledge discovered that actual common hourly earnings for all personal sector staff have decreased by 2.24% between January 2021 to Might 2024. [Technical point: For our analysis, we adjusted nominal average hourly earnings for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for all items, with 2018 as the base year. CPI-U covers 87% of U.S. consumers.]
Second, quarterly knowledge from the BLS identifies that actual median weekly earnings for full-time staff (utilizing 1982-1984 CPI-adjusted {dollars}) have decreased by 2.14% from the primary quarter of 2021 to the primary quarter of 2024.
Third, the Bureau of Economic Analysis identifies that actual per-capita disposable private earnings (utilizing chained 2017 {dollars}) has decreased by 9.04% between the primary quarter of 2021 and the primary quarter of 2024.
Actual private disposable per-capita earnings presents a special image of buying energy by together with earnings sources apart from earnings, such as “Social Safety and different authorities advantages, dividends and curiosity, [and] enterprise possession.” Because of this, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the conservative-leaning American Motion Discussion board and former director of the Congressional Funds Workplace, instructed us in a cellphone interview that earnings presents “a broader measure of buying energy” than wages. In keeping with the BEA, disposable earnings denotes the earnings “residents have left to spend or save after paying taxes.”
Whereas Scott is appropriate that common hourly earnings have grown at a slower tempo than inflation during the last three years, nominal wages have nonetheless elevated for the everyday American. The BLS estimates that nominal common hourly earnings (measured in present {dollars} with out adjusting for inflation) have elevated by 16.64% between January 2021 and Might 2024.
Nonetheless, in every of the three macroeconomic metrics we’re utilizing to guage buying energy, Scott is appropriate that the everyday American’s earnings and wages have didn’t hold tempo with inflation since Biden entered the presidency.
Yellen’s Timeline: 2019 to 2023
When requested to assist Yellen’s declare, the Treasury Division cited two experiences revealed by the CBO and the Treasury Department, which each establish will increase within the common American’s buying energy by analyzing adjustments in adjusted market earnings and weekly earnings, respectively. Not like Scott, these research recognized will increase in actual wages between late 2019 and late 2023.
Biden made the same declare to Yellen’s in an interview with Time Journal on Might 28, arguing that “wage will increase have exceeded what the price of inflation, which you’re speaking about as the costs that had been pre-COVID costs.”
By all of the three measures we’ve evaluated, Biden and Yellen are appropriate.
Actual common hourly earnings (calculated by adjusting nominal average hourly earnings for inflation utilizing the CPI-U) elevated by 1.20% between February 2020 and Might 2024, whereas disposable per-capita real personal income elevated by 6.06% between the fourth quarter of 2019 and the primary quarter of 2024. Lastly, real median weekly wages elevated by 0.83% between the fourth quarter of 2019 and the primary quarter of 2024. These findings assist Biden’s declare that the common shopper possesses extra buying energy right this moment than earlier than the pandemic.
Current short-term adjustments in shopper buying energy additionally assist Biden’s argument. Between Might 2023 and Might 2024, common hourly earnings progress has outpaced worth will increase, rising at an inflation-adjusted price of 0.81%. Moreover, between the primary quarter of 2023 and the primary quarter of 2024, actual disposable private earnings per capita has elevated by 1.11%. Lastly, actual median weekly wages elevated by 0.55% between the primary quarter of 2023 and the primary quarter of 2024.
It’s price noting that Yellen additionally addressed this problem throughout an interview on the identical June 16 episode of “This Week” through which Scott argued that actual wages decreased beneath Biden. Throughout this present, Yellen tried to repeat her earlier declare, however cited an incorrect timeframe — referring as a substitute to the final three years.
“Nicely, it’s true that, during the last roughly three years, there’s been a big improve within the worth degree,” she said. “I’d level out, in fact, that wages have additionally gone up throughout this time, and authorities research present that, for all — for households in any respect factors within the earnings distribution wages have gone up considerably greater than costs.”
As we described earlier, from January 2021 to the current, the inflation-adjusted measures of common hourly earnings, median weekly earnings, and per-capita disposable private earnings all decreased. Holtz-Eakin known as Yellen’s declare from June 16 “demonstrably false.”
Nevertheless, Yellen’s earlier assertion from April, and the proof supporting her declare offered to us by the Treasury Division, all examine wage and earnings knowledge from earlier than the pandemic to the current and accurately establish an upward development.
Impression of the Pandemic on Actual Wage and Earnings
The totally different timeframes utilized by Scott and Yellen spotlight the affect of the pandemic in altering measurements of the everyday American’s buying energy. In March 2020, when the World Well being Group declared a pandemic, all three of our reported metrics shortly spiked upward and subsequently declined within the following months.
When Yellen and Biden examine pre-pandemic actual wage charges with current charges, they use a timeframe that predates the March 2020 spike. Nevertheless, Scott’s timeframe begins in the beginning of 2021, after the height of the spike.
Due to the distortionary results of the pandemic, measurements of actual wage and earnings progress ranging from 2019 are considerably totally different from measurements starting in 2021, as illustrated within the chart beneath.
Explaining the Disruptive Function of the Pandemic
A number of economists’ explanations of those fluctuations in actual wages and incomes through the pandemic targeted on the exit and reentry of low-wage staff from the workforce. Biden’s CEA wrote in April 2021 {that a} “sharp, one-month improve in reported common wages” occurred early within the pandemic “as a result of thousands and thousands of comparatively low-paid staff misplaced their jobs, whereas comparatively high-paid staff remained employed.”
Holtz-Eakin corroborates {that a} “large chunk” of the greater than 20 million workers who misplaced their jobs early within the pandemic labored in “the leisure and hospitality and different sectors which have an abundance of low-skill, inexperienced staff.”
In a report by the Hamilton Undertaking on the Brookings Establishment, economists Chloe East, Wendy Edelberg, and Noadia Steinmetz-Silber write that “from February 2020 to April 2020, the unemployment price elevated by 15.4 proportion factors for these with lower than a highschool schooling, in comparison with 6.5 proportion factors for these with no less than a bachelor’s diploma.”
Dean Baker, senior economist for the Middle for Financial and Coverage Analysis, a labor-focused suppose tank, instructed us in an e-mail that these adjustments within the labor market at the start of the pandemic had been “akin to telling the 5 shortest individuals to depart a room. The common peak of the individuals remaining is larger, although nobody has gotten any taller.” Because of this, he argues that “the rise in actual wages in the beginning of the pandemic was an phantasm.”
Subsequently, the Economic Policy Institute, a suppose tank partly funded by labor unions, argues that the U.S.’s restoration from the pandemic within the following months reversed this development, driving actual common wage progress down as many of those low-wage staff rejoined the labor pressure.
In a February 2022 report on the actual wage beneficial properties over the 2 years of the pandemic, the Dallas Federal Reserve defined the impacts of those “composition results,” which it outlined because the “common wages of people who go away the workforce, in contrast with those that enter it over the interval.”
The report recognized an abnormally giant optimistic composition impact driving up common hourly wages at the start of the pandemic. Subsequently, it additionally recognized a big damaging composition impact driving down common wages within the second quarter of 2021, which the report stated resulted from the fast reentry of low-wage staff into the labor pressure. (See the chart beneath from the report.)
Baker supplied one other rationalization for the fluctuations in per-capita disposable private earnings. In a February article for CEPR, he asserted that actual per-capita earnings spiked in 2020 “primarily as a result of pandemic checks” included within the CARES Act handed beneath then-President Donald Trump and the “$1,400 an individual” stimulus from “Biden’s restoration bundle.” Holtz-Eakin refers to this roughly $5 trillion in complete stimulus spending through the pandemic as an “huge switch to households.”
Nevertheless, Baker stated that “these packages principally went away after 2021, which explains many of the drop in 2022.” He identified that 2021 “was additionally a 12 months of sharp inflation, which outpaced wage progress for many staff. That additional lowered actual earnings.”
Subsequently, choosing a timeframe that begins when Biden entered workplace, as Scott did in his interview with ABC Information, contains this sharp drop in actual per-capita disposable earnings in the midst of 2021.
When Ought to the Evaluation Start?
We’ve established that whereas actual wages have elevated since 2019, they haven’t grown for the reason that starting of the Biden administration. However tips on how to consider buying energy and actual wages beneath Biden stirs a debate amongst some economists.
In an e-mail message, a Treasury spokesperson argued that “the 2021 Bureau Labor of Statistics knowledge on earnings was skewed and shouldn’t be used as a comparability level” as a result of “the individuals out of the labor pressure at the moment had been disproportionally low-income such that the those who had been working then skewed greater earnings. This made it look artificially like wages spiked in 2020 and remained elevated in 2021.” As a substitute, the spokesperson argued that “the comparability level that’s extra dependable for wage measurement is in 2019, simply earlier than the pandemic, when there was close to full employment as there’s right this moment.”
When requested whether or not she felt it was extra helpful to start an evaluation of actual wage progress beneath Biden in 2019 or 2021, Chloe East, a College of Colorado Denver Economics Professor and nonresident fellow with the Hamilton Undertaking at Brookings, instructed us in a cellphone interview that the choice was one thing she and her friends at Brookings “struggled with.” Finally, they determined to start their evaluation in 2019 as a result of it supplied “extra secure” knowledge. “There have been nonetheless adjustments in 2021,” she argues, making wage knowledge from that 12 months extra “risky” than 2019.
Nevertheless, Holtz-Eakin disagrees with this strategy. He argues that by the point Biden entered workplace, the president “inherited an economic system that was rising quickly and had recovered from the recession,” and that many of those low-skill staff had already reentered the labor pressure. He factors to the unemployment price, which had decreased from a pandemic excessive of 14.8% in April 2020 to six.4% by the point Biden took workplace in January 2021. For context, the unemployment price has stayed inside the 3.4%-4% vary between December 2021 and the current, and was 3.5% in February 2020. Subsequently, Holtz-Eakin stated he believed it’s cheap to start his evaluation of adjustments in actual wages beneath Biden in January 2021, and never earlier than the pandemic.
It’s price noting that our evaluations of macroeconomic metrics beneath Biden revealed within the Biden’s Numbers quarterly experiences typically consider knowledge starting with the beginning of his administration in January 2021.
Editor’s observe: FactCheck.org doesn’t settle for promoting. We depend on grants and particular person donations from individuals such as you. Please contemplate a donation. Bank card donations could also be made by way of our “Donate” page. Should you choose to present by verify, ship to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Coverage Middle, 202 S. thirty sixth St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
