Climate "communicators" say lying is best way to convince voters about global warming - NaturalNews.com

Climate “communicators” often argue that to convince voters about global warming is best done through lies.

Blue Rose Research data scientist David Shor recently conducted a poll focusing on effective forms of public messaging about climate change. According to him, those most adept at communicating are those who outright lie to the public regarding global warming.
Shor didn’t put it quite this way, nor are we speaking on his behalf; what we are suggesting here is that everything listed as being among the “best” messaging is often nothing more than falsehood. According to the poll, some of the “best messages ever tested” include false claims regarding climate tyranny’s supposed advantages: 1) Reduced energy costs 2) Decreased kitchen sink costs 3) Creation of stable jobs 4) Investments in transit infrastructure and manufacturing 5) Research & development of clean energy All this talk amounts to nothing; none of it really happens when government sets on climate action. Green energy tends to be expensive, inefficient and highly politicized – leading to division between those on both sides of the political divide. “Lefties” tend to embrace anything green while righties often dislike or oppose it. Truth be told, earth-based fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil are both plentiful, affordable and beneficial to creating stability and prosperity for all; greenies don’t believe otherwise (Related: If given free rein by climate terrorists, your gas stove could eventually disappear for good; green is not necessarily best!). (Read this. ).
Watts Up With That recently published a report about the falsities found within Shor’s poll’s “best” column, outlining all their deceits and falsities. Watts Up With That strives to build human liberty while providing people with information needed to lead healthier lifestyles and become aware of potential dangers to human freedom. Discover our decentralized, peer-to-peer, uncensorable Brighteon.io free speech platform here and discover our downloadable AI tools at Brighteon.AI – both at no charge to use! Every purchase made at HealthRangerStore.com directly funds our efforts to develop more tools for empowering humanity with knowledge and abundance. Concerning energy costs, author Charles Rotter cites evidence suggesting that people living in areas that rely heavily on green energy – like California, United Kingdom Canada or Germany – tend to pay higher energy rates, in comparison with places without much or any green energy availability at all. Concerning the creation of “good, secure jobs,” Rotter makes clear how important environmental policy can be: Employees from Solyndra, Proterra, Fisker and Arrival UK among others have provided ample examples as Rotter notes that this could also include pipeline and construction workers. The California High Speed Rail Disaster is another prime example of environmental policies gone bad. As with other green projects of similar scope, California’s rail pipe dream offers no greater economic benefit than simply paying one group of workers to dig holes while another fills them back up again,” according to Rotter. “Clear energy research and development (R&D)” are often presented as another hoax, since their funding goes toward fighting thermodynamic laws, detracting from economic development, raising energy prices and leading to environmental devastation. Rotter states that traditional energy provides “stable, dispatchable and small environmental footprint baseload power”. How about bad messaging though, you might ask? Here we go: “[Tested messages for worst outcomes include] electric cars, Green New Deal, frontline communities and climate pollution…Electric car messaging has proven particularly corrosive among Democrats – particularly women, as battery costs become an immediate fear factor for driving electric. “[This was an intriguing take on range anxiety that I hadn’t considered before].” The Green New Deal has become an embarrassment to environmentalists due to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), who first proposed it in 2019, being associated with it and with “bans on burgers and flying, inciting fear over making energy more costly”, as per one poll’s findings. Man-made global warming is nothing more than an elaborate hoax designed to undermine your freedom. Learn more at Climate.news where sources such as WattsUpWithThat and NaturalNews provide more detailed coverage than these sites provide. WattsUpWithThat and NaturalNews provide helpful sources; sources include WattsUpWithThat and NaturalNews for example.