Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Life & Arts myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
Karl Marx, Hans Holbein, George Frideric Handel, Kai Havertz: some Germans do their greatest work in London. This, plus Germans being, in my expertise, the most effective English-speakers on the continent, can feed the sense that these are kindred nations, regardless of the primary half of the final century.
However Germany specialises in manufacturing. Britain is the second-biggest exporter of companies on the earth. Germany has a diffusion of necessary areas. Britain is extra dominated by its foremost metropolis than maybe any wealthy nation of serious dimension. Germany has coalition governments, with three events within the present one. British politics is so winner-takes-all that Keir Starmer bought a 174-seat majority from a 34 per cent vote share. Germany’s fiscal coverage is prudent to a fault. Britain has not run a funds surplus because the flip of the millennium. Germany is federal. Britain is centralised. Germany was a founding member of the European venture. Britain joined late and left.
Even the feel of life in these nations is precisely completely different. You possibly can experience a space-age practice throughout Germany after which see somebody utilizing a fax machine on a non-ironic foundation. Britain is best digitised however much less good at tangible infrastructure.
These are two distinct, in reality virtually oppositional, methods of working a medium-sized, high-income democracy. But each are converging on one factor: failure. Britain’s troubles are extra well-known and continual, whereas Germany’s is perhaps extra acute. It was the worst-performing main financial system in 2023. Its once-serene politics are deteriorating.
The lesson? By no means idealise different nations. It looks like a cosmopolitan factor to do, however it’s the final in parochialism. The left are repeat offenders. The Sweden-worship of the Nineties was credulous sufficient. However throughout the Angela Merkel period, Germany was Shangri-La for UK and US progressives, who hailed proportional illustration over brute majoritarianism, industrial technique over laissez-faire, smooth energy over Anglo-American militarism. Berlin itself — a hipper and fewer gilded metropolis than London or New York — turned proof of idea.
Effectively, time has difficult the image. Multi-party authorities, it appears, can carry indecision. Shaping the financial system can imply backing present industries over emergent ones. Tender energy generally is a euphemism for naivety within the face of mortal enemies. Having numerous high-quality cities however no megalopolis can imply forgoing the financial advantages of agglomeration.
When two such completely different nations get into such comparable ruts on the similar time, we must always doubt if there’s a “proper” mannequin. What there are are trade-offs. Other than the fundamentals — property rights, tax assortment, common public companies, and so forth — virtually no coverage is an unqualified good. Making one factor higher will are inclined to make one other factor worse. Management is a matter of selecting which issues to have.
Germany’s selections weren’t flawed. It’s nonetheless richer than Britain. But when the prices and perverse outcomes had been onerous to anticipate in Germany, think about how a lot tougher from overseas. That is the inherent threat of adoring overseas exemplars. The UK and particularly the US are set on emulating industrial technique, however with out the pedigree for it, or adequate consciousness of its blended monitor report.
In the long run, which of those two unalike nations is in additional bother? Economically, Britain. Germany carries much less public debt. Its quest to make fewer machine components and extra superior applied sciences is solely doable over time. There may be the cushion of the European single market.
On the political rating, although, Germany’s extremism problem is worse. It has a Kremlin-smitten far left, not simply essentially the most strident of the most important hard-right events in Europe. And the benefit of Britain’s Napoleonic centralisation is a ruthless decisiveness. A nasty prime minister or two can (and did) wreck issues. However a first-class one would get the nation shifting once more.
For higher or worse, France is Britain’s actual twin: in per capita earnings, in maritime publicity, in being a unified state for therefore lengthy, in hoarding a lot in its capital, in having misplaced an unlimited extra-European empire. A Story of Two Cities shouldn’t be about London and Munich. Even that Anglo-German level of contact, soccer, is a laughable mismatch. Germany has 4 World Cups to England’s one. The fascination on this bilateral relationship lies within the (peaceable) distinction. How droll, then, that when the 2 sides arrive ultimately at one thing in widespread, it’s nationwide malaise.
Electronic mail Janan at [email protected]
Discover out about our newest tales first — observe FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and subscribe to our podcast Life & Art wherever you hear
