Non-investing private finance points together with insurance coverage, credit score, actual property, taxes, employment and authorized points comparable to trusts and wills.
Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Wed Might 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
SWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:29 pm
Hopefully one of many property planning attorneys on the discussion board will help with this. Inlaws have revocable dwelling trusts. They’re the trustee of their very own belief, then the successor trustee of one another’s belief. Upon demise, belief property are distributed to the surviving partner or 3 daughters if partner predeceases. I do not suppose that is something uncommon.Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
They need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
toddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:36 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:29 pm
Hopefully one of many property planning attorneys on the discussion board will help with this. Inlaws have revocable dwelling trusts. They’re the trustee of their very own belief, then the successor trustee of one another’s belief. Upon demise, belief property are distributed to the surviving partner or 3 daughters if partner predeceases. I do not suppose that is something uncommon.Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
They need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Thanks. Their belief or partner’s belief as contingent beneficiary? I assume their very own however simply confirming.
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Wed Might 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
SWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:36 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:29 pm
Hopefully one of many property planning attorneys on the discussion board will help with this. Inlaws have revocable dwelling trusts. They’re the trustee of their very own belief, then the successor trustee of one another’s belief. Upon demise, belief property are distributed to the surviving partner or 3 daughters if partner predeceases. I do not suppose that is something uncommon.Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
They need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Thanks. Their belief or partner’s belief as contingent beneficiary? I assume their very own however simply confirming.
Their very own belief, which is able to then have the ability to distribute to the daughters because the partner may have predeceased.
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
toddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:54 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:36 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:29 pm
Hopefully one of many property planning attorneys on the discussion board will help with this. Inlaws have revocable dwelling trusts. They’re the trustee of their very own belief, then the successor trustee of one another’s belief. Upon demise, belief property are distributed to the surviving partner or 3 daughters if partner predeceases. I do not suppose that is something uncommon.Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
They need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Thanks. Their belief or partner’s belief as contingent beneficiary? I assume their very own however simply confirming.
Their very own belief, which is able to then have the ability to distribute to the daughters because the partner may have predeceased.
For my very own training….why would not you title the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries. Would not that create much less administration and have the identical outcome if the partner is deceased?
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Wed Might 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
SWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 11:53 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:54 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:36 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:29 pm
Hopefully one of many property planning attorneys on the discussion board will help with this. Inlaws have revocable dwelling trusts. They’re the trustee of their very own belief, then the successor trustee of one another’s belief. Upon demise, belief property are distributed to the surviving partner or 3 daughters if partner predeceases. I do not suppose that is something uncommon.Nonetheless, each inlaws even have conventional IRAs and have named one another’s belief as the first beneficiary. I am undecided I’ve seen this earlier than so simply in search of some steerage on whether or not that is applicable. I suppose I used to be anticipating to see every of them title the opposite partner as the first beneficiary, then the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries.
Thanks upfront.
They need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Thanks. Their belief or partner’s belief as contingent beneficiary? I assume their very own however simply confirming.
Their very own belief, which is able to then have the ability to distribute to the daughters because the partner may have predeceased.
For my very own training….why would not you title the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries. Would not that create much less administration and have the identical outcome if the partner is deceased?
It retains all of it in as soon as place. Your belief ought to already specify what to do if a number of daughter additionally predeceases, and if they’ve children. Importantly, this may increasingly not have the identical outcome as leaving it instantly in case you are not very cautious about your beneficiary designations.
It could permit asset swapping, like if one youngster needs the household residence which is price greater than a 3rd of the property. Relying on how the belief is about up, it permits leaving the inheritance in belief, which gives creditor and ex-husband safety, and retains the inheritance out of the kid’s property ought to they attain a taxable property stage. In my case my youngsters are minors, so it has a in-built guardianship.
It in all probability does not matter a lot on this case, nevertheless it’s usually preferable.
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
You could do it both means. I desire your strategy because it avoids the pointless step of working the IRA via an administrative belief that can terminate. You would need to embrace provisions in case a baby predeceases you.
- Posts: 3666
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
toddthebod wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 7:37 amSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 11:53 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:54 pmSWYK wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:36 pmThey need to title one another as main beneficiary so as to have the ability to assume the IRA as their very own. The belief ought to be the contingent beneficiary.
Thanks. Their belief or partner’s belief as contingent beneficiary? I assume their very own however simply confirming.
Their very own belief, which is able to then have the ability to distribute to the daughters because the partner may have predeceased.
For my very own training….why would not you title the three daughters as contingent beneficiaries. Would not that create much less administration and have the identical outcome if the partner is deceased?
It retains all of it in as soon as place. Your belief ought to already specify what to do if a number of daughter additionally predeceases, and if they’ve children. Importantly, this may increasingly not have the identical outcome as leaving it instantly in case you are not very cautious about your beneficiary designations.
It could permit asset swapping, like if one youngster needs the household residence which is price greater than a 3rd of the property. Relying on how the belief is about up, it permits leaving the inheritance in belief, which gives creditor and ex-husband safety, and retains the inheritance out of the kid’s property ought to they attain a taxable property stage. In my case my youngsters are minors, so it has a in-built guardianship.
It in all probability does not matter a lot on this case, nevertheless it’s usually preferable.
Doesn’t the RLT want particular language that can permit for a ten yr stretch vs. 5 years?
Additionally, isn’t that language wanted to keep away from having the Revenue from IRA Wiithdrawals being taxed on the Beneficiary Tax fee vs. Belief Price?
Clearly, I’m not a lawyer, simply somebody wrestling with this problem …
WoodSpinner
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
WoodSpinner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:20 am
…
Doesn’t the RLT want particular language that can permit for a ten yr stretch vs. 5 years?Additionally, isn’t that language wanted to keep away from having the Revenue from IRA Withdrawals being taxed on the Beneficiary Tax fee vs. Belief Price?
Clearly, I’m not a lawyer, simply somebody wrestling with this problem …
You may put the youngsters’s trusts both within the Will or in a separate belief instrument.
In both case, earlier than the brand new rules, we thought that you simply in all probability wanted some extra language to ensure it certified for the stretch (which earlier than SECURE was over the life expectancy of the oldest beneficiary of every kid’s belief). That is now not a problem beneath the brand new rules.
If the trustees have discretion as to distributions, they will resolve every year how a lot, if something, to distribute and the way a lot, if something, to retain within the belief, making an allowance for revenue taxes and another elements they deem related.
-
- Posts: 3666
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
bsteiner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:47 amWoodSpinner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:20 am
…
Doesn’t the RLT want particular language that can permit for a ten yr stretch vs. 5 years?Additionally, isn’t that language wanted to keep away from having the Revenue from IRA Withdrawals being taxed on the Beneficiary Tax fee vs. Belief Price?
Clearly, I’m not a lawyer, simply somebody wrestling with this problem …
You may put the youngsters’s trusts both within the Will or in a separate belief instrument.
In both case, earlier than the brand new rules, we thought that you simply in all probability wanted some extra language to ensure it certified for the stretch (which earlier than SECURE was over the life expectancy of the oldest beneficiary of every kid’s belief). That is now not a problem beneath the brand new rules.
If the trustees have discretion as to distributions, they will resolve every year how a lot, if something, to distribute and the way a lot, if something, to retain within the belief, making an allowance for revenue taxes and another elements they deem related.
Bruce,
Undecided I’m clear on the revisions …
Do the See By way of Guidelines for a Belief Nonetheless Apply?
I discovered this on the Constancy website nevertheless it doesn’t fairly reply the query…
https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/wea … to-a-trust
See-through belief guidelines
Pre-SECURE Act 1.0, a belief wanted to fulfill “see-through” necessities to make sure that as a beneficiary, the belief would qualify for all times expectancy stretch provisions. There are 4 necessities to qualify as a see-through belief:The belief should be legitimate beneath state regulation.
The belief should be irrevocable or develop into irrevocable upon the demise of the account holder.
All the belief’s underlying beneficiaries should be identifiable as being eligible to be designated beneficiaries themselves.
A replica of the belief should be offered to the custodian by October 31 the next yr after the account holder’s demise.Publish-SECURE Act 1.0, there was some uncertainty as as to if the “see-through” guidelines will apply as a result of they weren’t particularly addressed within the SECURE Act laws. The IRS, nonetheless, revealed proposed rules in February 2022 which included “see-through” belief guidelines: These rules acknowledge the “see-through” belief idea and permit the IRA property to be withdrawn inside a 10-year interval.
WoodSpinner
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:06 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
One other attainable dialogue level with their lawyer… In case your in-laws have a considerable web price, have they thought of leaving the property in trusts for his or her youngsters relatively than having the RLT property of the surviving partner be instantly distributed?
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
WoodSpinner wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 9:17 ambsteiner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:47 amWoodSpinner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:20 am
…
Doesn’t the RLT want particular language that can permit for a ten yr stretch vs. 5 years?Additionally, isn’t that language wanted to keep away from having the Revenue from IRA Withdrawals being taxed on the Beneficiary Tax fee vs. Belief Price?
Clearly, I’m not a lawyer, simply somebody wrestling with this problem …
You may put the youngsters’s trusts both within the Will or in a separate belief instrument.
In both case, earlier than the brand new rules, we thought that you simply in all probability wanted some extra language to ensure it certified for the stretch (which earlier than SECURE was over the life expectancy of the oldest beneficiary of every kid’s belief). That is now not a problem beneath the brand new rules.
If the trustees have discretion as to distributions, they will resolve every year how a lot, if something, to distribute and the way a lot, if something, to retain within the belief, making an allowance for revenue taxes and another elements they deem related.
Bruce,
Undecided I’m clear on the revisions …
Do the See By way of Guidelines for a Belief Nonetheless Apply?
…
The foundations nonetheless apply (besides the brand new rules eradicated the requirement to provide the IRA custodian a replica of the Will or belief instrument).
The key change is that permissible appointees should not counted as beneficiaries. That had been unclear, although all of us assumed that they in all probability counted. So we needed to restrict powers of appointment in trusts receiving IRA advantages so that they could not be exercised in favor of anybody older than the specified measuring life, or in favor of charity. That meant that every beneficiary ended up with two trusts, one for the IRA property and one for the opposite property. That is now not obligatory. That simplifies the drafting.
-
- Posts: 3666
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
bsteiner wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 10:05 amWoodSpinner wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 9:17 ambsteiner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:47 amWoodSpinner wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:20 am
…
Doesn’t the RLT want particular language that can permit for a ten yr stretch vs. 5 years?Additionally, isn’t that language wanted to keep away from having the Revenue from IRA Withdrawals being taxed on the Beneficiary Tax fee vs. Belief Price?
Clearly, I’m not a lawyer, simply somebody wrestling with this problem …
You may put the youngsters’s trusts both within the Will or in a separate belief instrument.
In both case, earlier than the brand new rules, we thought that you simply in all probability wanted some extra language to ensure it certified for the stretch (which earlier than SECURE was over the life expectancy of the oldest beneficiary of every kid’s belief). That is now not a problem beneath the brand new rules.
If the trustees have discretion as to distributions, they will resolve every year how a lot, if something, to distribute and the way a lot, if something, to retain within the belief, making an allowance for revenue taxes and another elements they deem related.
Bruce,
Undecided I’m clear on the revisions …
Do the See By way of Guidelines for a Belief Nonetheless Apply?
…
The foundations nonetheless apply (besides the brand new rules eradicated the requirement to provide the IRA custodian a replica of the Will or belief instrument).
The key change is that permissible appointees should not counted as beneficiaries. That had been unclear, although all of us assumed that they in all probability counted. So we needed to restrict powers of appointment in trusts receiving IRA advantages so that they could not be exercised in favor of anybody older than the specified measuring life, or in favor of charity. That meant that every beneficiary ended up with two trusts, one for the IRA property and one for the opposite property. That is now not obligatory. That simplifies the drafting.
Recognize the data — many thanks
WoodSpinner
Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
After consulting with an property planning lawyer, my spouse and I are planning to replace our conventional and Roth IRA beneficiary designations. Presently, we’ve got every named one another as the first beneficiary and a belief established upon our demise (beneath the phrases of our Wills) for the good thing about our kids because the contingent beneficiary.
Now that our youngsters are getting older (15/18) and modifications ensuing from the Safe Act, we’re contemplating the next: we are going to nonetheless be one another’s main beneficiary however the contingent beneficiary will probably be our kids (50% every). Nonetheless, it is my understanding that we might want to designate a guardian or custodian as a part of the beneficiary designation since they’re minors. It is my understanding, in idea, that this may be finished however that almost all monetary establishments haven’t got their web site or beneficiary kinds designed for this selection.
Has anyone efficiently completed this at Vanguard? Once I contacted Vanguard, they stated no….we may title a person (together with a minor) however there was no method to title a guardian/custodian as a part of the beneficiary designation. I am not satisfied I used to be related with probably the most educated Vanguard consultant so I’m planning to name once more later this week. Or has anyone efficiently completed this at Constancy or Schwab….as I might be keen to switch these accounts if obligatory to perform this.
Thanks!
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
The trusts had been listed because the contingent beneficiaries at Vanguard — 50% to “The Delamer Older Child’s Belief” and 50% to “The Delamer Youthful Child’s Belief.”
We nonetheless wanted a trustee, named beneath the wills. However nothing in regards to the trustees was within the Vanguard designation of beneficiaries.
One factor that humbles me deeply is to see that human genius has its limits whereas human stupidity doesn’t. – Alexandre Dumas, fils
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:49 pm
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
I think that the minor’s guardian (as designated by the courtroom per the need) would wish to ascertain the account at Vanguard and there’s in all probability some particular documentation that Vanguard would require for that. I might ask Vanguard what the method is when a minor inherits an IRA.
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
I feel that is true in most states, however not in Alabama, Nebraska, or Mississippi:
In Alabama the age of majority is nineteen. This was affirmed within the case of Campbell v. Campbell.
In Nebraska, the age of majority can also be 19. That is set out beneath §43-2101
In Mississippi, the age of majority is 21. That is codified beneath the Mississippi Code title 1, S1-3-27.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/age_of_majority
The extra vital query is, what did the lawyer advocate to OP? It sounds just like the change into consideration is coming from OP’s personal musings, not the lawyer. Or do I’ve that mistaken? I am shocked the lawyer would advocate you to designate the minor because the outright beneficiary of the IRA.
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
toddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm
The belief can (and doubtless ought to) stay the contingent beneficiary. Except there’s something uncommon in regards to the belief, the IRA may have the identical RMDs whether or not left in belief or left outright to the beneficiaries.
A short while again there was a particularly detailed thread the place you, or presumably another person, laid out all of the variations between completely different IRA beneficiary choices. Do you recall the place that thread is?
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
toddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm
The belief can (and doubtless ought to) stay the contingent beneficiary. Except there’s something uncommon in regards to the belief, the IRA may have the identical RMDs whether or not left in belief or left outright to the beneficiaries.
Can or not it’s both a testamentary belief or a revocable belief?
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Wed Might 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
Prudence wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:55 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm
The belief can (and doubtless ought to) stay the contingent beneficiary. Except there’s something uncommon in regards to the belief, the IRA may have the identical RMDs whether or not left in belief or left outright to the beneficiaries.Can or not it’s both a testamentary belief or a revocable belief?
For the reason that revocable belief already outlines what to do together with your property after you die, it appears cleaner to depart it to your revocable belief, however you would additionally go away it 50/50 to your youngsters’s trusts, which I assume are created by your revocable belief whenever you die (provided that your partner predeceases you).
Wait, you are not OP. Sorry, yeah, you may go away it to both kind of belief. Additionally, I ought to point out that Bruce, who does this for a dwelling, prefers the latter possibility, leaving it on to the youngsters or their trusts, because it requires much less administrative work than transferring the IRA via the quickly to terminate revocable belief.
- Posts: 7498
- Joined: Wed Might 18, 2022 12:42 pm
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
evancox10 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm
The belief can (and doubtless ought to) stay the contingent beneficiary. Except there’s something uncommon in regards to the belief, the IRA may have the identical RMDs whether or not left in belief or left outright to the beneficiaries.A short while again there was a particularly detailed thread the place you, or presumably another person, laid out all of the variations between completely different IRA beneficiary choices. Do you recall the place that thread is?
This one?
viewtopic.php?t=436931
(Similar OP!)
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
toddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:17 pmevancox10 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:51 pmtoddthebod wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm
The belief can (and doubtless ought to) stay the contingent beneficiary. Except there’s something uncommon in regards to the belief, the IRA may have the identical RMDs whether or not left in belief or left outright to the beneficiaries.A short while again there was a particularly detailed thread the place you, or presumably another person, laid out all of the variations between completely different IRA beneficiary choices. Do you recall the place that thread is?
This one?
viewtopic.php?t=436931
(Similar OP!)
No, longer thread with extra data, and a bit older (couple months or one thing like that). I will maintain trying and publish again if I discover it, thanks although.
-
- Web site Admin
- Posts: 98635
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:34 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
- Contact:
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
(Because of the member who reported the publish and offered a hyperlink to this thread.)
To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it is twice the scale it must be.
Re: Designating a minor beneficiary at Vanguard
evancox10 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:25 pmI feel that is true in most states, however not in Alabama, Nebraska, or Mississippi:
In Alabama the age of majority is nineteen. This was affirmed within the case of Campbell v. Campbell.
In Nebraska, the age of majority can also be 19. That is set out beneath §43-2101
In Mississippi, the age of majority is 21. That is codified beneath the Mississippi Code title 1, S1-3-27.
The Nebraska statute says that 18 yo’s can enter into contacts, so presumably can open a brokerage account by themselves.
The Alabama case was a divorce continuing and I didn’t instantly see the place it outlined a minor or age of majority and even used these phrases.
The Mississippi hyperlink simply acknowledged {that a} minor was beneath 21, with no specifics on what that meant, particularly getting into into contracts, or opening brokerage, financial institution, bank card accounts by themselves.
Edit: discovered a website that stated that Mississippi 18 yo’s can enter into contracts and open financial institution accounts by themselves.
Alabama does seem to permit 18 yo’s to open financial institution accounts by themselves if they’re or have been within the armed forces. Though one other part of the regulation says that 18 yo’s can enter into contracts, with no caveats.
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
LadyGeek wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 5:57 am
SWYK – As a way to present applicable recommendation, it is best to maintain all the data in a single spot. I merged your replace again into the unique thread. If in case you have any questions, ask them right here.(Because of the member who reported the publish and offered a hyperlink to this thread.)
LadyGeek. These should not associated posts. The primary associated to my in-laws and their property planning involving their grown up children (50s) versus my property planning involving minors. IMO, matters shouldn’t be merged as grownup beneficiaries should not the identical as minor beneficiaries.
Edit: Plus the query posted about my property planning doesn’t contain a dwelling belief…so the merged title shouldn’t be appropriate. Thanks for reconsidering.
Re: Beneficiary Designation for IRA when Living Trust
That will be preferable to working it via an administrative belief that is going to be wound up.
Alternatively, you would possibly go away it to trusts for the good thing about the daughters (or the problem of a predeceased daughter).
