Search...
Explore the RawNews Network
Follow Us

BBC Confirm rounds up truth checks of this election's disputed claims

[original_title]
0 Likes
July 2, 2024
BBC Seven party spokespeople at BBC election debateBBC

BBC Confirm has been fact-checking the political events throughout this election marketing campaign and seen some questionable claims on the forefront of the talk.

If you’re nonetheless making up your thoughts earlier than heading to the polls, here’s what you’ll want to find out about a few of the probably deceptive statements the events have made.

Tories declare Labour spending would put taxes up by £2,000 per household

This determine dangers deceptive individuals as a result of it provides up 4 years of supposedly further taxes ensuing from Labour’s manifesto spending plans.

It was asserted by Rishi Sunak 11 occasions within the first leaders’ debate and he has been using it on social media ever since.

That isn’t what you’d usually consider if someone mentioned your taxes have been going up by £2,000 – you’d assume they meant in a single 12 months.

The Office for Statistics Regulation has said “somebody listening to the declare would haven’t any method of realizing that that is an estimate summed collectively over 4 years”.

The Conservatives additionally mentioned the costings of Labour’s plans have been labored out by neutral civil servants, however some are based mostly on assumptions made by politically appointed particular advisers. Labour disputes the figures.

You can read more here.

Labour declare Conservative spending would imply £4,800 further in your mortgage

This determine – unveiled at a press convention by the shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves – relies on some questionable assumptions about how a lot the Conservatives must borrow in the event that they gained the election and the influence of this borrowing on Financial institution of England rates of interest.

It has been posted a number of occasions on Fb and likewise posted on X by Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves.

The Conservatives say they may be capable of pay for his or her deliberate tax cuts by saving £12bn a 12 months from the welfare invoice. Labour’s calculations assume they might make none of those financial savings in any respect, which might be unrealistic.

Additionally, the £4,800 determine is the supposed further mortgage prices on a family added up over 5 years, not the associated fee falling in a single 12 months, which dangers deceptive individuals.

The statistics regulator has referred to as for extra context and transparency round how this determine was reached.

You can read more here.

Liberal Democrat bar charts

The Liberal Democrats’ election literature has had a heavy emphasis on tactical voting on this election and, as in different years, has used numerous bar charts.

In a single constituency on this marketing campaign, a leaflet reveals the get together’s native vote share in 2010 and Labour’s share in 2017, two cherry picked years.

The declare that “solely the Liberal Democrats can beat the Conservatives right here” is deceptive.

If that they had chosen 2019, then the chart would have proven the Lib Dems on 15.1% and Labour on 24.8%.

The chart additionally misses out the vote share of the Conservatives who’ve truly held the seat since 2010.

LibDems Bar chart showing the Liberal Democrats on 34.4% and Labour on 27% and saying that only the Liberal Democrats can beat the ConservativesLibDems

The Office for Statistics Regulation says “polling or election outcomes information must be visualised in a method that doesn’t mislead the common reader in regards to the relative help for various events”.

Some Lib Dem marketing campaign literature – in addition to some produced by other parties in areas of the nation – doesn’t move that check.

Different leaflets have used native election outcomes as a information to the final election, which may be unreliable, or they’ve exaggerated the scale of their bars within the chart to spice up their obvious efficiency.

You can read more here.

Reform UK claims migrants in small boats may very well be returned to France

Selecting up small-boat migrants within the English Channel and returning them to France is a core Reform UK pledge. Occasion chairman Richard Tice has repeatedly claimed the UK is legally entitled to do that.

However there is no such thing as a proof that that is the case.

Whereas worldwide maritime legal guidelines permit a state to select individuals up at sea if they’re “at risk of being misplaced”, they don’t permit them to be taken to a different state with out that nation agreeing.

In response to James M Turner KC, a delivery lawyer at Quadrant Chambers: “The French must grant specific permission for UK vessels to hold rescued individuals by their territorial waters and to depart them ashore in France.”

Ainhoa Campàs Velasco, a maritime regulation professional from the College of Southampton, mentioned migrants couldn’t be returned to French shores “with out prior settlement with France”.

There isn’t any such settlement between the UK and France. Mr Tice says he has his personal authorized recommendation however has not shared this, regardless of a request from BBC Confirm.

You can read more here.

The SNP claims Labour’s North Sea oil plans threat 100,000 jobs

PA Oil platformsPA

One-hundred-thousand is roughly the variety of jobs that Scotland’s oil and fuel trade helps within the wider economic system however it’s deceptive for the SNP Westminster chief Stephen Flynn to repeatedly counsel Labour’s plans put all of those jobs in danger.

Labour has mentioned it will not subject new oil and fuel licences, nevertheless it has additionally pledged to not overturn present licences.

And the Local weather Change Committee, the federal government’s unbiased adviser, has mentioned there may be potential for the transfer to renewable vitality to “create extra jobs than can be misplaced” throughout the UK.

You can read more here.

The Greens’ claims on their tax plans

Co-leader Adrian Ramsay has mentioned that the tax-to-GDP ratio that the Inexperienced Occasion is proposing would take us nearer to the place the common European nation is and that the UK is at present proper on the backside.

In truth, in 2021 the UK raised extra from taxes as a share of the economic system (33.5%) than European nations equivalent to Eire, Switzerland, Latvia and Lithuania.

And by 2027-28 the UK tax take is already on target to maneuver to 37.7%, close to the average of Western European nations.

The Inexperienced Occasion manifesto proposes to boost as much as £151bn a 12 months from new taxes by 2029 – a rise of about 4.5% of GDP.

If carried out on high, this may take the UK tax share to about 42% of GDP, increased than the present Western European common.

You can read more here.

Plaid claims the UK authorities owes Wales £4bn due to HS2

If the excessive pace rail venture HS2 had been an “England-only” spending scheme, one thing referred to as the Barnett System may need kicked in.

That is meant to make sure when public spending goes up on England-only initiatives, the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Eire mechanically get a proportional sum of additional money to spend how they see match.

Plaid chief Rhun ap Iorwerth mentioned that “in keeping with typical compensation guidelines, Wales is owed some £4bn” – based mostly on the estimated £66bn value of the HS2 venture.

However the venture was not classed as England solely and rail infrastructure will not be an space devolved to Wales so there is no computerized launch of the HS2 cash to Wales underneath the Barnett framework.

Plaid desires to exchange Barnett with a “needs-based funding method”.

However the unbiased Institute for Fiscal Research assume tank warns such a reform wouldn’t essentially imply extra funding for Wales as a result of Wales already receives about 20% extra for companies than is spent on comparable companies in England.

You can read more here.

BBC Verify logo
Social Share
Thank you!
Your submission has been sent.
Get Newsletter
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus