Are Cobra's Limit3d irons definitely worth the $3K price ticket? | Proving Floor

Welcome to GOLF.com’s ClubTest Proving Floor, the place managing equipment editor Jonathan Wall and senior equipment editor Ryan Barath put the newest designs and groundbreaking know-how within the gear area to the take a look at on the vary and the course.

The instruments: Cobra Limit3d (7-iron; N.S. PRO MODUS³ Tour 105X shaft), Ping i230 (7-iron; N.S. PRO MODUS³ Tour 105X shaft)

The take a look at: To find out if a 3D-printed iron with a $3K price ticket can reside as much as the hype.

The outcomes: Sticker shock is an effective solution to seize a golfer’s consideration. Throw a $2K-plus price ticket on a set of irons and watch what occurs. Curiosity often takes maintain, which is strictly what occurred in 2016 when PXG launched its authentic 0311 irons at $400 per membership. The polymer-filler, hollow-cavity iron was in contrast to something within the trade.

Quick ahead to 2024 and almost each main gear producer has a hollow-cavity players-distance iron.

Who’s to say if Cobra’s 3D-printed Limit3d will comply with an identical path, nevertheless it’s attention-grabbing to notice the 2 irons share some similarities. A sky-high price ticket ($3K per set), restricted availability and groundbreaking know-how. It additionally helps that Bryson DeChambeau is utilizing a set of 3D-printed printed irons with custom bulge and roll baked in.

This could possibly be the way forward for iron design. Or it could possibly be a fad.

To get a greater deal with on Limit3d’s bona fides, I pitted the 3D design in opposition to my Ping i230 avid gamers to see how they stacked up. Whereas the iron seems like a blade at handle — it’s barely extra compact than i230 — the lattice design on the again of the pinnacle creates a weight discount that makes it potential so as to add upwards of 100 grams of tungsten inside the heel and toe.

Extra tungsten means higher ball speeds on extreme misses. As Mike Yagley, Cobra’s VP of innovation and AI, famous throughout a current dialog, he noticed minimal ball velocity loss on toe misses throughout his preliminary testing. Simply to place that statement into perspective, it’s pure to see wherever from 13-18 yards of distance loss with related better-player fashions, based on GOLF’s robotic information.

It virtually sounded too good to be true.

Nonetheless, primarily based on the numbers I noticed throughout my very own testing, the hype is for actual. Let’s begin with the launch monitor numbers from Foresight’s GCQuad launch monitor.

Cobra Limit3d: 131.1 mph (ball velocity) | 20.4 levels | 6,652 RPMs | 179.8 yards (carry)

Ping i230: 127 mph (ball velocity) | 20 levels | 6,396 RPMs | 175.3 yards (carry)

The numbers above are a mean of the 8 pictures I hit with every iron. The numbers inform an attention-grabbing story that highlights the significance of getting match. The Limit3d was 4 mph quicker than my i230s with an identical launch angle and 300 RPMs extra spin. If I spent the time discovering the perfect shaft, I’d be capable of squeeze a couple of extra yards out of the Limit3d.

Not solely was the iron quicker, it produced spectacular ball velocity numbers on toe strikes, too. At one level through the testing session, I hit a number of balls out on the toe to see the way it carried out. For probably the most half, ball velocity dropped roughly 2 mph on even probably the most excessive toe misses — an indication that the extra tungsten packed contained in the heel and toe was doing its job.

The general really feel of the membership was what I’d deem to be muscleback strong with a contact of game-improvement safety. It seems like a solid-construction mannequin at impression, however you don’t get the unfavourable vibrations when it misses out of the toe or heel. The sound at impression was heavy and purposeful. If I didn’t know what I used to be utilizing, I’d swear it was a cast mannequin. It felt that good.

If there was one quibble, it’s that the Limit3d was virtually too far left of the goal line for my liking, which is saying one thing contemplating I like to remain left of the middle with my shot form. The i230 had a tighter total dispersion and was ever-so-slightly left of heart.

I spent almost a half day constructing my i230 irons at Ping headquarters, so I count on them to be dialed. Might I get the Limit3d to supply an identical dispersion sample and shot form? Probably. However with solely the 7-iron to check, I’m possible going to place an finish to testing as a substitute of continuous down the rabbit gap. My greatest concern is discovering the iron to be noticeably higher and never having the chance to check it via the bag.

For the right-handed crew who does have the flexibility to choose up a full set, I can affirm the Limit3d does numerous issues very well. The general really feel and ball velocity retention have been significantly spectacular, to the purpose that I’m prepared to proclaim they’re definitely worth the $3K quantity.

This feels just like the infancy levels of 3D printing within the gear area, however there’s no query Cobra is already onto one thing with its preliminary iron providing.

Need to overhaul your bag for 2024? Find a fitting location near you at True Spec Golf.

Jonathan Wall

Golf.com Editor

Jonathan Wall is GOLF Journal and GOLF.com’s Managing Editor for Gear. Previous to becoming a member of the workers on the finish of 2018, he spent 6 years overlaying gear for the PGA Tour. He may be reached at [email protected].