Challenge 2025 offers a roadmap for “the subsequent conservative President” to downsize the federal authorities and essentially change the way it works, together with the tax system, immigration enforcement, social welfare applications and power coverage, significantly these designed to deal with local weather change.
It additionally wades deeply into the tradition battle that has been dividing the nation. Challenge 2025 requires abolishing the instructing of “‘vital race principle’ and ‘gender ideology’” in public faculties, and “deleting” phrases similar to “range, fairness and inclusion,” “gender fairness,” and “reproductive well being” from “each federal rule, company regulation, contract, grant … and piece of laws that exists.”
Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, has sought to tie Trump to the 887-page book, which was written partly by the previous president’s aides. Harris and Democrats consult with the plan as “Trump’s Challenge 2025 agenda,” and cite it as proof (not all the time precisely) of what Trump will do as president, significantly on hot-button points similar to Social Safety, Medicare and abortion.
For his half, Trump has claimed he is aware of nothing in regards to the plan, and his marketing campaign stated that Challenge 2025 “shouldn’t be related to the marketing campaign.”
Right here, we check out the plan: what’s in it, who wrote it and what the candidates have stated about it.
Who funded and wrote Challenge 2025?
The challenge is being led and funded by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative public coverage suppose tank based in 1973. Along with Heritage, there are greater than 100 conservative organizations on Challenge 2025’s advisory board. Amongst these “coalition partners” are the Heart for Immigration Research, Mothers for Liberty, Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America, Tea Get together Patriots, Turning Level USA and America First Authorized Basis, which is headed by Stephen Miller, a former Trump senior adviser.
The challenge’s policy agenda was revealed on-line as a guide titled “Mandate for Management: The Conservative Promise.” The guide has 30 chapters, every credited to a number of of its 35 major authors and editors — though the ultimate product contains enter from “a whole bunch of contributors,” the challenge’s organizers stated in a press release.
It’s the ninth edition within the “Mandate for Management” collection, the primary of which was revealed in 1981, throughout the Reagan administration. In response to its authors, earlier editions have had success in influencing authorities insurance policies.
“The Reagan administration applied almost half of the concepts included within the first version by the top of his first 12 months in workplace, whereas the Trump administration embraced almost 64% of the 2016 version’s coverage options after one 12 months,” the Hertiage Basis stated in a press release asserting Challenge 2025.
A number of the notable authors of this most up-to-date model embody Dr. Ben Carson, Christopher Miller and Russ Vought, who’re all former Cupboard secretaries below Trump. Carson, who wrote the guide’s chapter on housing, was the secretary of the Division of Housing and City Improvement; Miller, who wrote the chapter on protection, was an performing secretary of the Division of Protection; and Vought, who directed the Workplace of Administration and Finances, wrote the chapter in regards to the government workplace of the U.S. president.
Ken Cuccinelli, who was a deputy secretary for Trump’s Division of Homeland Safety, and Peter Navarro, Trump’s White Home adviser on commerce, additionally penned guide chapters.
“Actually, no less than 140 individuals who labored within the Trump administration had a hand in Challenge 2025,” a CNN review discovered.
The guide is one in every of “four pillars” that can be out there to the subsequent conservative president. The opposite pillars are:
- A personnel database, which can enable Challenge 2025 coalition members to “evaluation and voice their suggestions” for appointments.
- A “Presidential Administration Academy” to show new hires “how the federal government features and how one can perform in authorities.”
- A second doc — “the Playbook” — which can embody “transition plans” to permit the subsequent president to implement plans shortly.
What does Challenge 2025 suggest?
Challenge 2025 makes an attempt to place “in a single place a consensus view of how main federal businesses should be ruled.”
We can not summarize all of its proposals, however listed here are some examples:
Abortion: Challenge 2025 describes the Dobbs choice, which overturned Roe v. Wade, as “only the start.”
“Conservatives within the states and in Washington, together with within the subsequent conservative Administration, ought to push as onerous as attainable to guard the unborn in each jurisdiction in America,” the guide states. “Particularly, the subsequent conservative President ought to work with Congress to enact probably the most strong protections for the unborn that Congress will assist whereas deploying current federal powers to guard harmless life and vigorously complying with statutory bans on the federal funding of abortion.”
The guide calls on the Division of Well being and Human Companies to guard “the well being and well-being of all Individuals,” starting at conception, and to finish necessary medical health insurance protection of Ella, an emergency contraceptive that Challenge 2025 describes as a “potential abortifacient.” It additionally advocates utilizing an 1873 anti-vice law to dam abortion drugs from being despatched through the mail. (Extra about that later.)
The guide additionally requires ending federal funding for “Deliberate Parenthood and all different abortion suppliers and redirect[ing] funding to well being facilities that present actual well being care to ladies.” As we now have written before, Deliberate Parenthood offers greater than abortion providers. In its 2022-2023 annual report, Deliberate Parenthood stated it offered 4.6 million checks and remedy for sexually transmitted infections, 2.25 million contraception providers, 464,021 most cancers screenings and prevention providers (largely breast exams and Pap checks), and 1.1 million being pregnant checks and prenatal providers.
Authorities ‘effectivity’: Challenge 2025 proposes slicing federal spending and firing “supposedly ‘un-fireable’ federal bureaucrats.” (Individually, Trump has praised businessman Elon Musk for firing staff, and floated the idea of placing Musk in control of a authorities effectivity fee.)
The challenge recommends privatizing authorities features, together with the Nationwide Climate Service, Transportation Safety Administration, or TSA, and the Nationwide Flood Insurance coverage Program, in addition to eliminating the Division of Training and scores of applications, bureaus and workplaces all through authorities. The challenge additionally requires eradicating the Biden administration’s expansion of Title IX, which bans intercourse discrimination in schooling, to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identification. The courts have blocked the rule from taking impact.
As or different departments, the challenge requires the “wholesale overhaul” of the Division of Housing and City Affairs, the “top-to-bottom overhaul” of the Division of Justice, and a return “to the correct mission, the correct dimension, and the correct price range” on the Division of Homeland Safety. The Justice Division overhaul would come with “a plan to finish instantly any insurance policies, investigations, or instances that run opposite to regulation or Administration insurance policies.”
One frequent goal for cuts are workplaces and applications that promote clear power and monitor or mitigate the consequences of local weather change.
For instance, the challenge requires the dismantling of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which conducts research and issues reports on local weather change. Challenge 2025 says “many” of NOAA’s features may be “eradicated, despatched to different businesses, privatized, or positioned below the management of states and territories.”
It additionally requires the elimination of the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations and the Office of State and Community Energy Programs, which works with communities “to considerably speed up the deployment of fresh power applied sciences.” Equally, it recommends the elimination or “reform” of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, calling for an finish to the company’s “give attention to local weather change and inexperienced subsidies.”
Tax coverage: Challenge 2025 requires “low tax charges” and minimal “interference with the operation of the free market and free enterprise.”
Particularly, the plan requires abolishing the seven tax brackets for federal revenue taxes — 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37% — and making a “two-rate particular person tax system of 15 p.c and 30 p.c that eliminates most deductions, credit and exclusions.” It doesn’t say what particular deductions, credit and exclusions must be eradicated.
It additionally requires lowering the company tax price from 21% to 18%. The company tax price was 35% earlier than Trump signed the Tax Cut and Jobs Act in 2017, which lower the tax price to 21%. The capital beneficial properties tax — which ranges from 0% to 28%, relying in your revenue and kind of asset — would even be lower for a excessive of 20% to fifteen%. The IRS says that almost all taxpayers at the moment pay 15%.
“It’s onerous to know who will get damage by this as a result of they by no means say what the usual deduction is. For low-income individuals, moderate-income individuals commonplace deductions [are] a giant deal,” Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow on the City-Brookings Tax Coverage Heart, stated about Challenge 2025’s tax proposals in an interview with CBS News. “However, as you say, there are seven charges and three of them — 32%, 35% and 37% are increased than 30%, so it’s fairly clear that prime revenue people who find themselves at the moment paying a high price paying increased than 30% would profit considerably. They’re additionally going to profit considerably from the decrease capital beneficial properties charges. A lot of them are paying capital beneficial properties nearly at 25%, and on this proposal, they’d be paying as little as 15%. So, a giant deal for prime revenue individuals. Unimaginable to know what it means for decrease revenue individuals.”
Trump has provided his own tax plans, which embody making the 2017 tax cuts everlasting and additional lowering the company tax price.
Immigration: Challenge 2025 seeks to reinstate “each rule associated to immigration that was issued throughout the Trump Administration,” and calls for brand spanking new immigration insurance policies and a reorganization of all immigration operations.
The guide recommends tightening asylum necessities, lowering the variety of refugees, and reinstating Trump’s Migrant Safety Protocols, also referred to as Remain in Mexico program, which required immigrants to attend in Mexico throughout their immigration proceedings.
It seeks “the overturning of the Flores Settlement Agreement,” a 1997 court-approved settlement that serves as a nationwide coverage on how one can humanely deal with minors who enter the nation illegally. Amongst different issues, the settlement prohibits the federal authorities from detaining minors for greater than 20 days.
It additionally contains proposals to “[e]liminate or considerably scale back the variety of visas issued to overseas college students from enemy nations,” lower the variety of visitor employee visas and repeal the range visa program that awards visas on a lottery foundation to nations with low immigration to the U.S.
As president, Trump unsuccessfully sought to repeal the range visa program and transfer from a family-based to a merit-based system for admitting immigrants. Challenge 2025 additionally requires a merit-based system.
The guide additionally labels these two applications as “illegal”: the Humanitarian Parole Program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans and the Deferred Motion for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which bars the deportation of sure individuals who have been dropped at the U.S. illegally as kids.
Social welfare applications: Challenge 2025 cites fraud and waste in security internet applications and requires eliminating or lowering primary advantages for low-income people and households.
For Medicaid, Challenge 2025 proposes including work necessities for beneficiaries and “cut-off dates or lifetime caps … to disincentivize everlasting dependence.” The medical health insurance program for low-income Individuals lined nearly 74 million individuals in Might, based on the most recent knowledge.
The conservative plan additionally requires tightening work necessities for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, previously often known as meals stamps, and altering the eligibility necessities for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, which was created by the overhaul of the welfare system in 1996. New eligibility necessities would additionally scale back the variety of college students served by the nationwide faculty breakfast and lunch applications — which have been described within the guide as “inefficient, wasteful” applications.
Challenge 2025 additionally seeks to incentivize at-home baby care. “As an alternative of offering common day care, funding ought to go to folks both to offset the price of staying house with a toddler or to pay for familial, in-home childcare,” the plan states.
The plan requires the elimination of Head Start, a program that funds schooling, well being and social providers applications for low-income children below 5 years outdated.
What has Trump stated about it?
Again when Challenge 2025 was simply getting began, Trump spoke on the Heritage Basis’s annual management convention on April 21, 2022, and appeared to consult with the challenge, saying, “It is a nice group, and so they’re going to put the groundwork and element plans for precisely what our motion will do and what your motion will do when the American individuals give us a colossal mandate to save lots of America. And that’s what’s coming.”
However Trump has since pivoted sharply towards the plan.
“I do know nothing about Challenge 2025,” Trump wrote on Reality Social on July 5. “I don’t know who’s behind it. I disagree with a number of the issues they’re saying and a number of the issues they’re saying are completely ridiculous and abysmal. Something they do, I want them luck, however I’ve nothing to do with them.”
Per week later, on July 11, Trump once more took to Reality Social to additional distance himself from the plan.
“I do know nothing about Challenge 2025,” Trump wrote. “I’ve not seen it, don’t know who’s in control of it, and, in contrast to our very properly acquired Republican Platform, had nothing to do with it. The Radical Left Democrats are having a discipline day, nevertheless, making an attempt to hook me into no matter insurance policies are said or stated. It’s pure disinformation on their half. By now, in spite of everything of those years, everybody is aware of the place I stand on EVERYTHING!”
In a July 22 speech in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Trump accused Democrats of making an attempt to falsely tie him to the plan. He stated that “the opposite aspect goes round making an attempt to make me sound excessive, like I’m an extremist. I’m not. I’m an individual with nice frequent sense. I’m not an extremist in any respect. Like, some on the correct, extreme proper got here up with this Challenge 25, and I don’t even know. I imply a few of them, I do know who they’re, however they’re very, very conservative. … They’re kind of the other of the novel left, OK? You have got the novel left and you’ve got the novel proper, and so they provide you with this. … I don’t know what the hell it’s. It’s Challenge 25. ‘He’s concerned in Challenge …’ After which they learn a number of the issues, and they’re excessive. I imply, they’re significantly excessive, however I don’t know something about it. I don’t need to know something about it.”
Trump went even additional in his rejection of the plan in an interview on “Fox & Associates” on July 25, claiming it was “pure disinformation” from Democrats making an attempt to tie him to it.
“It’s a gaggle of very, very conservative individuals and so they wrote a doc that lots of the factors are superb,” Trump stated. “Most of the factors are completely ridiculous. I’ve nothing to do with the doc. I’ve by no means seen the doc. I’ve seen sure issues which are stated in it. And it’s a gaggle of very conservative those that most likely like me, nevertheless it doesn’t matter as a result of it doesn’t communicate for me.
“They wrote one thing that I disagree with in lots of instances — and in some instances, you agree. However it’s like a gaggle of radical left those that write one thing and, you realize, individuals get offended by it. It is a doc I do know nothing about. It’s referred to as Challenge 25. I heard about it per week in the past. And it has nothing to do with me by any means.
“However, after all, our mates which are Democrats — radical left Democrats — they take the doc, which is, I assume, fairly large and thorough, and so they scour by means of it. And something that’s unhealthy in there or that’s somewhat bit lower than mainstream, they take it and so they make a giant deal out of it. … I haven’t seen the doc. I don’t intend to actually see the doc. And it’s a gaggle of those that received collectively that wrote some type of a dream doc for them. However it has completely nothing to do with me.”
5 days later, on July 30, the day the Heritage Basis announced that Paul Dans, director of Challenge 2025 was stepping down, the Trump marketing campaign put out a statement on “Challenge 2025’s Demise.”
“President Trump’s marketing campaign has been very clear for over a 12 months that Challenge 2025 had nothing to do with the marketing campaign, didn’t communicate for the marketing campaign, and shouldn’t be related to the marketing campaign or the President in any manner,” co-campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita said. “Stories of Challenge 2025’s demise could be tremendously welcomed and may function discover to anybody or any group making an attempt to misrepresent their affect with President Trump and his marketing campaign— it won’t finish properly for you.”
Heritage Basis President Kevin Roberts said the challenge had “accomplished precisely what it got down to do: bringing collectively over 110 main conservative organizations to create a unified conservative imaginative and prescient, motivated to devolve energy from the unelected administrative state, and returning it to the individuals.” Roberts stated the challenge was all the time slated “to conclude its coverage drafting after the 2 get together conventions this 12 months, and we’re sticking to that timeline.” Though the coverage writing portion of the challenge was completed, he stated, “Challenge 2025 will proceed our efforts to construct a personnel equipment for policymakers of all ranges—federal, state, and native.”
Roberts additionally burdened that Challenge 2025 was a “software … constructed for any future administration to make use of.”
What have Democrats stated about it?
In a number of instances, Democrats have gone past the details, calling it “Trump’s Challenge 2025 agenda” and claiming, based mostly on the conservative proposal, that Trump will implement insurance policies that he says he opposes.
“If you learn it, you will note Donald Trump intends to chop Social Safety and Medicare,” Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, said at a July 23 rally in Milwaukee, for instance.
Challenge 2025 does lay out “4 targets and ideas” for Medicare “reform,” however there’s nothing within the guide that requires slicing Social Safety, which the authors of the challenge call a “fable.”
Moreover, Trump has stated that he has no plans to chop Social Safety or Medicare. When he was president, Trump did not propose slicing Social Safety’s retirement advantages, and his budgets included bipartisan proposals to cut back the expansion of Medicare with out slicing advantages.
Challenge 2025 additionally got here up many occasions throughout the Democratic Nationwide Conference in August.
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, who spoke on the third night time of the DNC, called the plan “Donald Trump’s roadmap to ban abortion in all 50 states.” He additionally claimed that the plan “places limits on contraception” and “threatens entry to IVF,” or in vitro fertilization.
The guide does suggest imposing the Comstock Act, an 1873 anti-vice law, to forestall the mailing of abortion drugs, that are utilized in more than half of U.S. abortions. However Trump, when requested in an August interview about imposing the regulation, indicated he wouldn’t.
As for contraception, Challenge 2025 doesn’t usually name for limiting frequent strategies of contraception, similar to contraception drugs or intrauterine gadgets, or IUDs. As an alternative, the guide particularly proposes eliminating necessary insurance coverage protection for Ella, an emergency contraceptive that the guide’s authors say might induce abortions. However that concern is not backed by science, as emergency contraceptives work by stopping ovulation and being pregnant.
The proposal additionally says that the federal government “ought to finish taxpayer funding” of Planned Parenthood, which offers abortion and contraception providers, and that the federal government ought to maintain spiritual and ethical exemptions for employers who don’t want to cowl contraceptives for staff.
Within the case of IVF, the guide doesn’t suggest outlawing the reproductive procedure by which eggs from ovaries are fertilized with sperm to create embryos which are later implanted within the uterus. However language in the plan may very well be interpreted to support the idea that embryos or fetuses must be granted the identical rights as an individual who has been born. That would result in authorized challenges round IVF as a result of unused embryos are sometimes discarded.
Nonetheless, Trump has stated he helps each contraceptives and IVF. He additionally has proposed mandating that the federal authorities or medical health insurance corporations “pay for all prices related to IVF remedy.”
The Harris marketing campaign additionally has paid for TV ads that say Challenge 2025 proposes “eliminating the Division of Training” whereas “requiring the federal government to watch ladies’s pregnancies.”
The conservative plan does say that “Congress ought to shutter” the Training Division “and return management of schooling to the states.” Trump additionally supports abolishing that federal division.
As well as, in a bit in regards to the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, the coverage agenda calls for the improved reporting of abortion knowledge, together with by means of laws that requires “states, as a situation of federal Medicaid funds for household planning providers, to report streamlined variables in a well timed method.”
However Trump has not made such a proposal. In an April interview with the journal Time, Trump was requested whether or not he thought states that had banned abortion “ought to monitor ladies’s pregnancies to allow them to know in the event that they’ve gotten an abortion after the ban.” In response, Trump stated, “I believe they may do this,” including that may be left to “the person states” – simply as he says abortion legal guidelines must be decided by every state.
Editor’s word: FactCheck.org doesn’t settle for promoting. We depend on grants and particular person donations from individuals such as you. Please think about a donation. Bank card donations could also be made by means of our “Donate” page. For those who favor to offer by examine, ship to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Coverage Heart, 202 S. thirty sixth St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
