Simona Halep questioned the “huge distinction” in how doping instances are handled after world No. 2 Iga Swiatek was handed a one-month ban whereas the Romanian was out of motion for over 18 months following two separate anti-doping violations.
The Worldwide Tennis Integrity Company (ITIA) stated on Thursday that Swiatek had accepted a one-month suspension after testing optimistic for the banned substance trimetazidine (TMZ).
The Pole examined optimistic in August however the ITIA, which runs tennis’s anti-doping program, accepted that it was attributable to contamination of her remedy melatonin.
Halep was provisionally suspended in October 2022 and later banned for 4 years, a interval which was decreased to 9 months in March after an enchantment on the Court docket of Arbitration for Sport.
She had strongly denied knowingly taking the banned substance roxadustat and stated she had proof to indicate small quantities of the anemia drug entered her system from a contaminated licensed complement.
“I stand and ask myself, why is there such an enormous distinction in therapy and judgment?” former world primary Halep stated in a put up on Instagram on Thursday. “I can not discover and I do not assume there generally is a logical reply.
“It may well solely be dangerous will from the ITIA, the organisation that has performed completely every part to destroy me regardless of the proof … It was painful, it’s painful and perhaps the injustice that was performed to me will all the time be painful.”
Reuters has contacted the ITIA for remark.
Former Wimbledon and French Open champion Halep had criticized tennis authorities for the size of time it took to course of her case. After her provisional suspension in October 2022, Halep obtained her four-year ban in September 2023.
Swiatek, who was world No. 1 when she failed the take a look at, was provisionally suspended on Sept. 12, however had it lifted on Oct. 4, leaving her with simply over every week’s ban to serve.
Gamers on each excursions known as out what they perceived as double requirements within the sport when males’s world No. 1 Jannik Sinner was cleared of wrongdoing regardless of failing two drug exams earlier this yr.
An impartial tribunal accepted the Italian’s clarification that the anabolic agent clostebol had entered his system from a member of his assist workforce via massages and sports activities remedy.
Sinner might nonetheless be banned for as much as two years with the World Anti-Doping Company interesting the choice in his case at sport’s highest courtroom.
Amid questions in regards to the dealing with of the instances of Swiatek and Sinner, ITIA chief government Karen Moorhouse stated at a media briefing on Thursday: “These aren’t instances of intentional doping. We’re coping with inadvertent breaches of the foundations.
“So I do not assume this can be a trigger for concern for tennis followers. The truth that we’re being clearly open, clear, and it exhibits the breadth and depth of our anti-doping program.”
The Skilled Tennis Gamers Affiliation (PTPA), which was established by Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil in 2020, stated late on Thursday that tennis wanted an anti-doping system rooted in transparency, consistency and objectivity.
“Gamers deserve and are entitled to due course of and assist in navigating the anti-doping system, no matter rating and entry to assets … [They] deserve and are entitled to governance that they belief,” the advocacy group added.
“Our combat to overtake the failing tennis system continues.”