Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the UK tax myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
Small companies are answerable for the overwhelming majority of tax evasion within the UK however HM Income & Customs doesn’t have a technique to fight the issue, based on the parliamentary spending watchdog.
In a brand new report centered on tax evasion within the retail sector, the Nationwide Audit Workplace has highlighted scams by companies that under-declare their earnings or artificially file for insolvency to keep away from tax payments earlier than relaunching as “phoenix” corporations conducting the identical enterprise.
“Though tax evasion has been rising amongst small companies, HMRC has to this point lacked an efficient strategic response,” mentioned Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, which launched its report on Monday.
The Labour occasion, which gained energy in July, has pledged to boost an additional £5bn a 12 months for the general public coffers by 2029-30 by tackling tax dodging.
HMRC estimates tax evasion by small companies rose to £4.4bn in 2022-23, accounting for 81 per cent of the overall in comparison with 66 per cent in 2019-20.
The tax authority has a technique for tackling all types of non-compliance, together with these brought on by taxpayer errors, however doesn’t have a selected concentrate on tackling evasion.
“This implies there was too little emphasis on some widespread types of tax evasion within the retail sector,” the NAO mentioned.
The watchdog highlighted scams akin to digital gross sales suppression, the place retailers use software program to cut back the recorded worth of transactions and current artificially low revenues. Different variations of the rip-off contain producing “dummy” units of accounts or operating tills in coaching mode to cut back taxable income.
These scams price the exchequer £450mn a 12 months, based on a 2019 HMRC estimate. The authority estimated “phoenix” corporations accounted for greater than £500mn of tax losses in 2022-23 however the NAO famous the Insolvency Service had disqualified solely seven administrators for this observe prior to now six years.
The introduction of on-line firm incorporation in 2011 additionally made it “fast and straightforward to arrange UK corporations on-line from anyplace on the earth, leaving the UK susceptible to tax evasion from fraudulent companies”, the report discovered.
A surge in new firm registrations forward of the introduction of tighter necessities at Firms Home, the UK’s company registrar, “might point out a probably greater threat of fraud within the retail sector”, the NAO mentioned.
VAT evasion by abroad retailers promoting on-line prices about £300mn a 12 months. However the NAO famous HMRC mentioned it had collected an additional £1.5bn a 12 months since 2021 modifications making on-line marketplaces accountable for VAT from abroad sellers.
The NAO report comes after official knowledge final month confirmed the variety of massive UK companies underneath investigation by HMRC for potential underpayment of tax has hit a five-year low.
“Tackling tax evasion will not be a simple job,” Davies mentioned. “However actual alternatives exist for HMRC to work extra systematically throughout authorities to cut back it. Tighter controls and extra compliance work might elevate vital sums and enhance worth for cash.”
Paul Monaghan, chief government of the Honest Tax Basis, mentioned: “For a lot too lengthy, the dialogue of tax avoidance within the UK has centered solely on multinational enterprises. Tax dodging by small enterprise is more likely to be at the very least, if no more, impactful.”
HMRC mentioned it raised a report £843bn in tax revenues final 12 months and works with the Insolvency Service and Firms Home “to sort out evasion in retail and on-line companies”.
“The UK has one of many lowest tax gaps reported on the earth, however the authorities is dedicated to lowering it additional,” it mentioned. “Whereas the overwhelming majority of companies pay the tax that’s due, we are going to proceed to make use of our civil and felony powers towards the decided minority who refuse to play by the principles. Such motion helped us shield £41.8bn prior to now 12 months.”
Extra reporting by Emma Agyemang in Copenhagen
