Talk about all common (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and points, investing information, and concept.
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Could 19, 2015 9:55 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: HEDGEFUNDIE’s excellent adventure Part II: The next journey
Post
by chrisdds98 »
jarjarM wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 6:42 pmfirebirdparts wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 6:40 pm
Appears to be like like we crossed into the “dangerous information is dangerous information” period as we speak. I do not know if we’ll keep there, however for as we speak no less than UPRO and TMF shifting reverse instructions on imagined rate of interest motion.TMF did job as we speak. Too dangerous my TMF allocation is skewed so it did not save me
about time, proper! hope we’re previous the inflation scare for now. I want there was a leveraged lengthy TIPS fund. there are numerous inflationary dangers (like local weather change, demographic employees scarcity, mass deportation of employees) that make me cautious of holding a nominal Treasury fund when there isn’t any cap on nominal charges. presumably actual charges cannot get too excessive
- Posts: 2386
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 10:56 am
Re: HEDGEFUNDIE’s excellent adventure Part II: The next journey
Post
by skierincolorado »
TrendingValue wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 10:56 pmskierincolorado wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:53 pmLTCM wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:36 pmskierincolorado wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:45 am
I feel there are different brokers (TastyWorks?) that allow you to maintain STT as collateral for futures. It isn’t a giant concern for me although so long as I am not holding extreme money collateral.I feel its very onerous (unimaginable) to seek out brokers that let you maintain STT as collateral as a retail investor (particularly in retirement accounts). Discovering one on could be a fairly large deal for the effectivity of this technique.
Someone on this thread posted 2 years in the past that Tradestation permits it: viewtopic.php?t=289144
I am probably not involved about it and I feel the impact on the efficiency of the technique is negligible. You do not have to carry that a lot money. The charges charged by LETFs would dwarf any money drag utilizing futures by like an order of magnitude. And there presently isn’t any money drag as a result of charges are zero anyhow.
I do know I’m going all the best way again however I’m interested by this. In my calculations, particularly at present charges, utilizing UPRO got here out cheaper when evaluating amount of money collateral wanted to not be continuously checking (and curiosity foregone on holding it) with UPROs ER + 1% price of borrowing.
Use FOPs to eradicate money drag